Law Trump official: Statue of Liberty poem refers to Europeans

[cincymma79]

Does Japan contain indigenous, non-Asian peoples whose ancestors were on the land prior to Japanese settlement? Does Mexico? Or are the majority of Mexican citizens and by extension their leaders considered mestizo?

Yes to the first
And yes to the second

 

[TheGreatA]

I am not playing this game.

These games empower supremacists.

This new attempt at exclusion (income and health care tests) are clearly targeted not at criminal elements but the masses of typical immigrants coming now only because of the ethnicities of those immigrants. If they were masses of Norwegians, this would not be Trump's issue.

This is like playing games over the Republicans voter suppression tactics such as targeting an area with high Indigenous voting that leans heavily Democrat with a new regulation that says 'you cannot vote if you do not have a proper street address' when Reserves typically do not have that within and instead have one zip code type address.

People can play the spin game and pretend there is another intent simply because they can rationalize one, but we all know better.

right now the vast majority of immigrants are coming from ethnic communities. that is what Trump and Co want to choke off even if it means greatly slowing the growth of America, and thus the economy overall.

Newsflash, there are never going to be masses coming in from 1st world countries. So you don't have to worry a bout that.

The mass-movements will be coming in from countries that are at war, or suffer from high level of crime and government corruption, or outright tyranny. Yes, most of the people will be looking to escape rather than re-create these conditions, but not all. It is the duty of a state to protect both the immigrants, as well as the citizens, from anyone that might be looking to bring about the same problems, that already made these people's conditions so desperate, to where they saw no choice but to escape. To ask these people to re-live the horrors in their communities, to deal with the same scum whom they escaped from, is lunacy.

Any sensible government will prepare itself to counter the possible negative influences coming in, such as crime gangs, foreign provocateurs, or anti-American extremists/terrorists. The naive buffoons who cannot handle that, who are too mentally soft to acknowledge the darker aspects of humanity, ought to keep their hands out of the process. They will only bring about ruin, to both the immigrant as well as the native citizen.

Nothing destroys the reputation of a Muslim community more, than bringing in some jihadi fucks.
Nothing destroys the reputation of a Mexican community more, than bringing in some drug cartel scum.

One terror attack can undo a century of good-will, between populations.

That's the reality of it, and rational immigrants understand this, which is why they won't be in favour of the open borders, "see nothing, do nothing" bullshit.

The poems are fine, the ideals are fine, but countries are run based on pragmatism rather than the sentimental outbursts of a daydreamer.

 

[MikeMcMann]

Newsflash, there are never going to be masses coming in from 1st world countries. So you don't have to worry a bout that.

The mass-movements will be coming in from countries that are at war, or suffer from high level of crime and government corruption, or outright tyranny. Yes, most of the people will be looking to escape rather than re-create these conditions, but not all. It is the duty of a state to protect both the immigrants, as well as the citizens, from anyone that might be looking to bring about the same problems, that already made these people's conditions so desperate, to where they saw no choice but to escape.

Any sensible government will prepare itself to counter the possible negative influences coming in, such as crime gangs, foreign provocateurs, or anti-American extremists/terrorists. The naive buffoons who cannot handle that, who are too mentally soft to acknowledge the darker aspects of humanity, ought to keep their hands out of the process. They will only bring about ruin, to both the immigrant as well as the native citizen.

Targeting those without 'established health care' and those 'who do not need financial help' does little to nothing to address what you say. It is a clear way to target, not the criminal problematic ones, but rather the masses of immigrants, who at this time tend to be ethnics.

The spin and lie they are trying to use as cover and asking dupes to accept is that this is somehow a crime deterrent effort.

 

[brody_in_ga]

Does Japan contain indigenous, non-Asian peoples whose ancestors were on the land prior to Japanese settlement? Does Mexico? Or are the majority of Mexican citizens and by extension their leaders considered mestizo?

Ah, so we're going the whole "Indians were here first" route, so therefore America belongs to them? You realize that argument is silly, when one considers the following:

1.) "Indians" were not a unified federation. They didn't have a singular written language, government, etc..
2.) The native tribes were nomadic and at war with one another.
3.) All advanced societies were started through conquest, so why are whites the only people expected to give up their land and possessions?
4.) Lastly, the America we all know today, with it's institutions, laws, infrastructure, etc, was built by White Europeans. The founders of our country never intended it to become the multicultural shithole it's becoming.

 

[Joe]

Is Japan racist for wanting to remain majority Japanese? How about Mexico? Why is it that only majority white countries are expected to embrace multiculturalism?

Lol you think mexico isn't a multicultural society <45>

 

[58miles]

“Gimme your tired, lazy, stupid, violent, low-IQ masses, yearning for free shit. Come get yours.”

Fuck it. Let’s replace the constitution with that poem! Sounds legit.

You do realize that the legions of European farmers flocking to the United States in the 1800's were flocking here for free shit called land. Btw more often than not they got that free shit called land.

 

[Joe]

“Gimme your tired, lazy, stupid, violent, low-IQ masses, yearning for free shit. Come get yours.”

Fuck it. Let’s replace the constitution with that poem! Sounds legit.

You realize Americans looked down at those new immigrants as tired, lazy, stupid, violent, low-IQ masses, yearning for free shit

 

[Javelina]

I could be wrong, but something tells me, you're projecting...

well, that just shows that you don't know who you are talking too. but carry on amigo

 

[Joe]

I totally remember all the south american's flooding into our country through Ellis Island in the 1800's. Cuccinelli was asked a question about the poem and he answered it. Everything he said was true and of coarse the MSM is trying to change his words to fit their narrative.
I'm Japanese btw since ts is aking what none white's think of this.
Libs keep doing what you are doing and keep Trump in the WH............... "four more year"!

Cuccinelli is just doing the great time honored american tradition of saying when my people came they were good and hard working but these new people are not. American as fuck.

 

[JamesRussler]

You realize Americans looked down at those new immigrants as tired, lazy, stupid, violent, low-IQ masses, yearning for free shit

So what?

 

[JamesRussler]

You do realize that the legions of European farmers flocking to the United States in the 1800's were flocking here for free shit called land. Btw more often than not they got that free shit called land.

So what?

You realize Americans looked down at those new immigrants as tired, lazy, stupid, violent, low-IQ masses, yearning for free shit

Is this the alt account of @58miles ?

 

[Kitafuji]

Cuccinelli is just doing the great time honored american tradition of saying when my people came they were good and hard working but these new people are not. American as fuck.

Brah, people from Newport Beach don't even like it when the brown skin's flood the beach on the weekend.

See ya at Balboa Saloon,

 

[58miles]

So what?



Is this the alt account of @58miles ?

So a European definitely flocking to the US for free shit is somehow better than a Mexican, Nigerian or Pakistanis supposedly flocking here for free shit is better, how???

 

[djacobox372]

Is Japan racist for wanting to remain majority Japanese? How about Mexico? Why is it that only majority white countries are expected to embrace multiculturalism?

Yes, Japan and Mexico are very racist. How do you not know this? Why do you think America should be like them?

 

[JamesRussler]

So a European definitely flocking to the US for free shit is somehow better than a Mexican, Nigerian or Pakistanis supposedly flocking here for free shit is better, how???

I don’t think it’s better necessarily.
But it makes assimilation possible.

 

[58miles]

I don’t think it’s better necessarily.
But it makes assimilation possible.

Our immigration policy up until the mid 60s was never about a come one, come all deal, though. The requirements and quotas were very strictly regulated based on how it benefits us.
Basing immigration policy off of a statue with a nice but naive poem inscribed on it is just goofy and childish.

 

[brody_in_ga]

Lol you think mexico isn't a multicultural society <45>

Ah, so Mexicans wouldn't have a problem with Whites coming into their country by the millions and attempting to change their laws, culture, and heritage? Yeah...

 

[58miles]

Our immigration policy up until the mid 60s was never about a come one, come all deal, though. The requirements and quotas were very strictly regulated based on how it benefits us.
Basing immigration policy off of a statue with a nice but naive poem inscribed on it is just goofy and childish.

The immigration policy until the mid 60's wasn't in place to benefit the United states it was put in place to keep the US a white dominated country.

 

[TheGreatA]

The immigration policy until the mid 60's wasn't in place to benefit the United states it was put in place to keep the US a white dominated country.

America became the most powerful country in the world during that period, though. WW2 era up to the 60's, which saw almost zero immigration whatsoever.

Arguably starting to lose that position nowadays.

 

[F1980]

Why don't we just migrate people that we need? Takes me a month or more to see a doctor unless I go to the ER. We need more doctors and medical personnel.

The more non-doctors or people that aren't going to be doctors we get, the longer the waiting list is to see one.

Definitely not take in people who are not going to be a net positive to society.