Trump offers help for critically ill British child

  • Thread starter Thread starter BruceLeeOnTRT
  • Start date Start date
B

BruceLeeOnTRT

Guest
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/340513-trump-offers-help-for-critically-ill-british-child

President Trump on Monday offered to help a critically ill British child who has become a flashpoint in the United Kingdom debate over whether the government should have a say in individual matters pertaining to life and death.

Trump tweeted his support for Charlie Gard, a 10-month-old infant on life support due to complications from a mitochondrial disease. The controversy around Gard has engulfed the Vatican, which infuriated some on the right by not immediately siding entirely with the parents, who want to seek experimental medication in the U.S. or bring their child home to die.

“If we can help little #CharlieGard, as per our friends in the U.K. and the Pope, we would be delighted to do so,” Trump tweeted.

Gard’s case has created an international uproar and sparked debate over whether the government should be able to mandate “death with dignity” over a family’s wishes to seek out experimental medication for their sick child.

Gard was born with a rare genetic condition and cannot move or breathe on his own.


His parents want to bring him to the U.S. to seek experimental medication or take him home so they can spend their final hours together.

The Great Ormond Street Hospital where he is staying has argued the child would suffer harm because there is no prospect he will recover. The British Supreme Court is backing the hospital, opening the door for doctors there to withdraw life support for the child.

Gard’s parents will also not be allowed to take him home to die.
White House director of media affairs Helen Ferre said members of the administration had spoken to the Gard family in calls set up by the British government.

“The president is just trying to be helpful if at all possible,” Ferre said, adding that Trump had not spoken directly with the family and does not want to pressure them in any way.

Citing legal issues, the White House declined to say whether a U.S. hospital or doctor had become involved in the discussions to provide care for the child.

The Vatican has weighed in, saying “we must do what advances the health of the patient, but we must also accept the limits of medicine” and “avoid aggressive medical procedures that are disproportionate to any expected results or excessively burdensome to the patient or the family.”

“Likewise, the wishes of parents must be heard and respected, but they too must be helped to understand the unique difficulty of their situation and not be left to face their painful decisions alone,” Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia wrote.

“If the relationship between doctor and patient (or parents as in Charlie’s case) is interfered with, everything becomes more difficult and legal action becomes a last resort, with the accompanying risk of ideological or political manipulation, which is always to be avoided, or of media sensationalism, which can be sadly superficial.”

That statement infuriated conservatives, who are questioning why the Vatican did not prioritize the life of the child over the decision of the state.

Pope Francis on Sunday weighed in, saying the parents should be allowed to "accompany and treat their child until the end."

"The Holy Father is following with affection and emotion the situation of little Charlie Gard and expresses his closeness to his parents," a spokesman for the pope said. "He is praying for them, in the hope that their desire to accompany and care for their own child until the end will be respected."

Honestly it should have never even escalated this far. Parents did everything they could to raise the money for the surgery, entire communities got behind them. Let the kid have a chance. Good on Trump.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's their bairn, it should be their decision. I could understand it if the doctors were trying to save the kid, but they are about to pull the plug. He's going to die anyway. Why not let the parents throw one last Hail Mary pass? If it doesn't work, at least they'll know they tried everything they could.

War Emperor Trump.:cool:
 
At least Trump can use the power of Social Media for good once in a while.
I made a small donation to the GoFundMe. Good luck to Charlie and his family.
 
How many Charlies would have their lives cut short under Trumpcare?
 
Nobody has survived past infancy with his form of the disease. The kid has suffered serious brain damage, there's nothing left to save; he's a vegetable. Give it up already.
 
The kid is already badly braindamaged. The treatment might prolong his life somewhat.... but they're prolonging the life of a near vegetable who can possibly still feel pain. (Doctors just don't know.) There's nothing in it for Charlie whatsoever, it's just the parents trying to put off the inevitable.
 
>now he has a counter when they call American healthcare unsympathetic and cruel

4D

CHESS

But for real, this is an example of one of the reasons why I don't want governments involved with healthcare. The more they ""help"" the more they gave control and the more they can fuck up. Anything government run is extremely prone to becoming inefficient, incompetent, corrupt and tyrannical. I want the government to have as little involvement in my life and family as possible
 
How many Charlies would have their lives cut short under Trumpcare?

>if the government won't pay for it then nobody will and you're sentencing them to death since you don't want them to have it at all

When will this meme end
 
Nobody has survived past infancy with his form of the disease. The kid has suffered serious brain damage, there's nothing left to save; he's a vegetable. Give it up already.
This. The baby is going to die anyway, regardless of how he is used as a political football. Disgusting grandstanding from Trump trying to distract from how damaging his "work" on healthcare here in America is.
 
My wife is a ICU RN. Her biggest criticism of the healthcare system is that families can't accept the reality of actually losing family members and let machines keep them alive while the hospital rakes in the cash. The doctors in the U.S. say it's unlikely it would work. There is already serious brain damage.

But it's easy to say when it's not your child. Tough situation.
 
>now he has a counter when they call American healthcare unsympathetic and cruel

4D

CHESS

But for real, this is an example of one of the reasons why I don't want governments involved with healthcare. The more they ""help"" the more they gave control and the more they can fuck up. Anything government run is extremely prone to becoming inefficient, incompetent, corrupt and tyrannical. I want the government to have as little involvement in my life and family as possible
My thoughts exactly!
 
Man, this is a heartbreaking situation. I feel with the parents but unfortunately, this seems like a situation where the courts protecting the baby from the parent's denial.
Not that I want to blame the parents this must be a horrible position to be in.

And on top of all that. You have to have a conversation with Trump about medical procedures like their life isn't hard enough already.
 
>now he has a counter when they call American healthcare unsympathetic and cruel

4D

CHESS

But for real, this is an example of one of the reasons why I don't want governments involved with healthcare. The more they ""help"" the more they gave control and the more they can fuck up. Anything government run is extremely prone to becoming inefficient, incompetent, corrupt and tyrannical. I want the government to have as little involvement in my life and family as possible

Things like vaccinations and treatment for the poor generally don't work unless governments have some sort of involvement.

This case just as much shows the problems with private healthcare as well. The parents had a fundraising target of £1.2 million, so they could take their kid to the states and have some oral medicine administered, which isn't going to do jack-shit for him. Obviously some of that will be for care and accommodation, but I don't want to think how much of this doctor was going to charge them for something completely futile.
 
How many Charlies would have their lives cut short under Trumpcare?

It's projected at 24 million to lose their insurance, sooo......

"The death of one man is a tragedy. The death of millions is a statistic.
- Josef Stalin
 
17867326_1485817719.7165.jpg


They raised £1.3 million to pay for an experimental procedure to help this little guy. Who is the expert saying this procedure isn't going to work? Why shouldn't they be allowed to try?
 
Back
Top