Trump mad his political supporters aren't protected

[ScottE]

So wait now you're trying to say Trump isn't aggressively partisan in his policies and actions?

While laying that at the feet of Obama who made multiple attempts to work across the aisle, including in his first terms primary policy position, and then had to spend most of his presidency with a congress so committed to obstructionism they wouldn't even hold a hearing for a supreme court nominee and spent a substantial amount of time voting to repeal the ACA knowing full well it was pointless to do so while having zero plan for what to do after.

Trump is more divisive within his own administration then Obama was with an opposition party that's only policy position was to oppose anything Obama attempted. We are what a week out from Trump, publicly, blasting his AG for bringing charges against two GOP Reps (aka doing his job) solely on the basis of those charges harming their reelection bids.

 

[ScottE]

Which very far left social views were those?

Well he responded but managed to not answer what you asked instead going back to the tried and true well of labeling anything as socialist to avoid having to actually explain a position.

 

[Islam Imamate]

I understand what you're saying. I just don't agree. Trump is openly partisan in his tweets. Obama was openly, agressively partisan in policy and action. So it comes down to what we each individually view as more significant.

Trump is partisan there too though. His tax bill was hardly bipartisan and early on he was appointing some unsavory figures(Bannon, Flynt).

There's just no comparison, Trump is far more partisan.

 

[Amerikuracana]

Have we ever had such an openly partisan POTUS? At least before they had to pretend to be bipartisan every once in a while but this cunt sees no problem polarizing the nation more and more.

On actual issues.. That matter.. He's the least one-sided President in 50 years.

 

[Tekk]

So yes you don't know what charismatic means. Got it.

Yea, that seems to be his go-to when his argument gets wrecked

 

[panamaican]

I've said many times before that in my opinion Obama's world view and experiences as a black man raised partially outside of the US put him at an... I don't know what the word would be... disadvantage when having to try to connect with White Conservatives. If Obama was "merely" a Black Harvard Law graduate and successful lawyer, he would have a hard time understanding me, a White Midwestern Conservative peasant, and vice versa. Now add into that that he is also the most powerful man in the world and the ability to relate to one another grows. Add to this that much of his economic policies teetered right on the brink of Socialism. Conservatives don't like that. His constant remarks on race relations in the US which were many times in my opinion actively taken out of context by his political opponents to fire up his base. His views on trangenders and women in the military also didn't help.

You didn't really answer my question. I asked what his far left social views were.

Instead you're giving me some screed that because he's black and very well educated, you doubt that he could understand you. That's very prejudicial (not "racist" before someone misinterprets that word choice). It suggests, perhaps unfairly, that you might not have given him a fair shake because you, not he, perceived the differences between you as too great.

We're going to disagree on the constancy of his race related remarks. But I'm not sure how the comments he did make rise to the level of "far left".

 

[M3t4tr0n]

Another boring low energy Trump obsessed thread.

Must defend daddys embarrassing online hissy fits! Wah!

 

[lfd0311]

You didn't really answer my question. I asked what his far left social views were.

Instead you're giving me some screed that because he's black and very well educated, you doubt that he could understand you. That's very prejudicial (not "racist" before someone misinterprets that word choice). It suggests, perhaps unfairly, that you might not have given him a fair shake because you, not he, perceived the differences between you as too great.

We're going to disagree on the constancy of his race related remarks. But I'm not sure how the comments he did make rise to the level of "far left".

Most of his economif policies are outright Socalist. I believe I also said that. Socialism is neither a moderate nor Right Wing view. Neither are his Progressive views on Transgender issues, which I had originally intended to include in that post and failed to.