Elections Trump for POTUS mega thread

ShadowRun said:
Harris thread was created early July , Trump thread created end of September. Half of the post in Harris thread is about Trump ..
Click to expand...
Harris thread was created July 2024. Trump thread was September 2023. It's been around almost a full year longer.

Even if the half the Harris thread is about Trump, it would still require a bunch of Trump supporters to be going there aggressively for the thread to triple this one in a fraction of the time period. Not that the "why" matters, it's just an interesting observation.
 
panamaican said:
Harris thread was created July 2024. Trump thread was September 2023. It's been around almost a full year longer.

Even if the half the Harris thread is about Trump, it would still require a bunch of Trump supporters to be going there aggressively for the thread to triple this one in a fraction of the time period. Not that the "why" matters, it's just an interesting observation.
Click to expand...
Yea my mistake with the dates, There are a lot of separate Trump threads and not so many Harris ones. But interesting yea I wasn't trying to attack you, sorry if it came off that way
 
Trump made a comment about if Liz Cheney and war mongers want endless proxy wars, they should be the ones to fight. Of course, the left took it out of context, etc.

So out of context that Walsh, who has massive TDS, has to call it out. The comments section is hilarious.



This is an account with a million followers. So it is gaslighting to point out that it is a cheap fake, as the left calls it? And it’s trump stoking violence, when he is calling out war hawks, and it is the left saying he is calling for execution? These people are so broken

 
cottagecheesefan said:
Trump made a comment about if Liz Cheney and war mongers want endless proxy wars, they should be the ones to fight. Of course, the left took it out of context, etc.

So out of context that Walsh, who has massive TDS, has to call it out. The comments section is hilarious.



This is an account with a million followers. So it is gaslighting to point out that it is a cheap fake, as the left calls it? And it’s trump stoking violence, when he is calling out war hawks, and it is the left saying he is calling for execution? These people are so broken

Click to expand...

GagmnXUXYAAB03Y.jpg:large
 
Fedor>Cain said:
I'm sure this will be the one he finally wins!
Click to expand...

the man saw putin fine google for 20 decillion and was like i can do that too!

en.wikipedia.org

Matthew Kacsmaryk - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

the us district court in northern texas currently assigns cases in a way that any case filed in its amarillo division is automatically assigned to judge matthew kacsmaryk, a trump appointee and also an activist and christofascist.

so if his pet judge is going to play games then it would have to wait for it to get to the appeals court before it gets shot down.

i mean shit, kamala harris and 60 minutes has never even been there before, but the trump team are just trying to exploit a loophole.

but lol @ the angry orange toddler getting his precious fee fee's hurt over a 60 minutes interview that he was to chicken shit to even show up for.
 
Last edited:
idrankyourbeer said:
the man saw putin fine google for 20 decillion and was like i can do that too!

en.wikipedia.org

Matthew Kacsmaryk - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

the us district court in northern texas currently assigns cases in a way that any case filed in its amarillo division is automatically assigned to judge matthew kacsmaryk, a trump appointee and also an activist and christofascist.

so if his pet judge is going to play games then it would have to wait for it to get to the appeals court before it gets shot down.

i mean shit, kamala harris and 60 minutes has never even been there before, but the trump team are just trying to exploit a loophole.

but lol @ the angry orange toddler getting his precious fee fee's hurt over a 60 minutes interview that he was to chicken shit to even show up for.
Click to expand...

I wonder where all the FReeeeee Spreech people are going to be at on this? What you say conservabros? Do you think TV networks should not be allowed to edit interviews?

Let's hear how this would not be in clear violation of the 1st amendment
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

LeonardoBjj
Elections Age-based attacks are boomeranging back on Trump
6 7 8
Replies
146
Views
5K
ocfightfan
ocfightfan

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,254,165
Messages
56,631,306
Members
175,319
Latest member
Supra_Slik77

Share this page

Back
Top