Trout & Lara beat Canelo

[flowers tiger]

I'm sick of hearing all these chats about Canelo vs GGG

Let's be honest here...btw I'm Mexican so don't think I'm making this shit up...Canelo has been gifted many decisions simply because the corporations want to build him up as the next big thing in boxing.

Trout beat him and Lara beat him. They should be in talks to fight GGG. That's where the real fights are at

 

[Shael]

I didn't believe you until you mentioned being Mexican. Now Trout vs GGG is the fight to make.

 

[The Can Opener]

Lara was close but Trout? No way. I am not even a Canelo fan but he had that fight pretty easy.

 

[parrythehate]

no, trout was close too in my opinion and the judging was cringe worthy. He was the workhorse in that match. Lara, yeah I give it to him, by like a cunt hair. But your tin foil theory isnt that far fetched, but dont accept it as truth. Otherwise, you will bring yourself a lot of pain.

 

[flowers tiger]

Lara was close but Trout? No way. I am not even a Canelo fan but he had that fight pretty easy.

trout won

We always see the highlight of Canelo hurting trout with that one punch, but the rest of the fight was all Trout

 

[The Can Opener]

trout won

We always see the highlight of Canelo hurting trout with that one punch, but the rest of the fight was all Trout

Nah man, I know Canelo coasted a few rounds when he knew what the scorecards were but while he was coasting Trout wasn't doing anything at all. It was frustrating because I thought Trout had a chance but he just didn't do enough when he had to. Just like that Charlo fight. He decided to go all in once it was already too damn late.

 

[Seano]

Take that Canelo!

Golovkin- 1

Canelo- 0

 

[Queen B]

Canelo vs Trout

Canelo vs Lara

 

[City_Lights]

I had Canelo in both personally.

 

[JayElectra]

Neither were gifts in terms of him winning (two of the scores in Trout/Canelo were too wide, though, and the open scoring kind of ruined things). I thought both fights were very close, but neither could be called robberies.

 

[Shoemaker]

Neither were gifts in terms of him winning (two of the scores in Trout/Canelo were too wide, though, and the open scoring kind of ruined things). I thought both fights were very close, but neither could be called robberies.

What an awful idea that was.

 

[Shael]

I had Canelo up in the Lara fight but I wouldn't have called it a robbery if it had gone the other way.

 

[Mr2urbo]

Anybody that says Canelo won either of those fights easily is a fucking retard, neither fight was easy for Canelo

For the Trout fight I had it 6 rounds a peice but the knockdown was Canelo's saving grace

Lara hardly threw any punches, Canelo himself was unable to hurt Lara and the majority of the rounds where close but Canelo did enough to win them

 

[KingOfTheDojo]

I thought he lost both fights as well. I'm telling you guys Canelo is overrated as fuck. Lemieux beats him, hell I can honestly picture Curtis Stevens checking his chin.

 

[Seano]

I thought he lost both fights as well. I'm telling you guys Canelo is overrated as fuck.

Don't be ridiculous. He's beaten top level fighters FFS. Canelo coasted and made the Trout fight close on some fans cards but he knew he was way ahead because of the open scoring.

Lara didn't do shit to beat him either. I'm tired of people acting like Lara gets robbed all the time running around the ring the way he does. You don't win fights just by making a fight suck.

Lemieux beats him, hell I can honestly picture Curtis Stevens checking his chin.

Oh of course. Geale would knock him out too and probably everyone else Golovkin has fought too.

Stevens is a Canelo sparring partner. Stevens actually had a lot of praise for Canelo.

 

[Strange King]

No he didn't. They were very close but canelo won

 

[PUO3]

No, no they didnt.

I can see a case for saying Lara won as that was very close. Only had it separated by a round, two at best.

Trout was also a close fight but there is just about zero legit argument for saying Trout won imo. If you actually believe that Trout won (you dont), Id love your round by round reasoning.

 

[stuff jones]

Don't be ridiculous. He's beaten top level fighters FFS. Canelo coasted and made the Trout fight close on some fans cards but he knew he was way ahead because of the open scoring.

Lara didn't do shit to beat him either. I'm tired of people acting like Lara gets robbed all the time running around the ring the way he does. You don't win fights just by making a fight suck.



Oh of course. Geale would knock him out too and probably everyone else Golovkin has fought too.

Stevens is a Canelo sparring partner. Stevens actually had a lot of praise for Canelo.

Which top level fighter has he beaten cleanly? Cotto? Because Cotto battered a handicapped Martinez?

 

[PUO3]

Which top level fighter has he beaten cleanly? Cotto? Because Cotto battered a handicapped Martinez?

Youve gone full retard.

 

[Seano]

Which top level fighter has he beaten cleanly? Cotto? Because Cotto battered a handicapped Martinez?

Thats a loaded question. He beat Lara, Cotto and Trout. All of those are top fighters in their weight classes. Your bullshit opinion of their relevance or how you scored the fights personally doesn't factor, IMO. I don't like Lara at all, but that doesn't mean I get to say he doesn't rate.