Discussion in 'The War Room' started by Orgasmo, Feb 6, 2016.
No, I'm serious.
Tree chopping time?
So don't replace broadleafs with conifers...or parking lots.
Shit thread title. Trolling or retarded, hard tell, since you apparently can't spell.
They won't let you edit the title now after the thread is posted.
Just fucking with you man. It's late. Let's see where this goes.
Warm but at least they give us sweet. O2 and also don't add more CO2.
Specific species of tree.
Yeah... and how does that decrease in albedo stack up against a loss of snow, ice and changing cloud cover?
Ban all trees
Trees of peace
The trees just wanted to get home to their families safely.
Just a few bad trees.
Trees > TS.
The issue isn't Trees increasing global warming, it's that conifers are worse than broadleafs. As a simple analogy, if you replaced all the rifles used by the US army with Winchester Repeaters, they'd be much less dangerous, but that doesn't mean that rifles make people less dangerous.
I hope this one doesn't make it into the science denial grab bag.
Says you cuz you ain't seen me with a Winchester Repeater.
Looks like the lesson isn't "tree chopping time". Looks like the lesson, yet again, is for us to be more cautious about mass terraforming the environment. The problem isn't just the trees we're planting, but the fact we're clear-cutting so many down.
Aloysius O'Hare had the right idea
Conifer trees would absorb more heat so it makes sense actually.
Sounds like one of Comrade Bernie's upcoming policies.
Separate names with a comma.