Again, I'm not interested in magazine-style editorial commentary on individual anecdotes.
Anecdotes aren't real arguments, they're case studies. Arguments are formed by the numbers, with a good balance of quantitative and qualitative data, which I don't possess.
You can make literally any 'argument' you want with anecdotes, especially in the medical field.
People die in the most bizarre, unlikely circumstances, and those anecdotes make for real case studies too - but they don't make for strong arguments.
But I accept that anecdotes are easy pickings for a right wing media that's intent on telling you what to think, which seems to be what you're looking for here.
An easy answer to a problem that isn't yours.
What could be simpler?