- Joined
- Nov 15, 2012
- Messages
- 10,852
- Reaction score
- 0
From Towson's website:
Seriously?
Debating by yelling out as many words as possible?
Sounds like the typical liberal debate strategy.
From Towson's website:
Seriously?
Debating by yelling out as many words as possible?
Sounds like the typical liberal debate strategy.
@Sebchenier. I like your analysis but it does not apply to more recent changes in US debating competitions. The issues you describe seem inherent to the entire anglosphere. In the United Kingdom, Parliamentary debates often feature taunting opponents, whereas in the old continent there is an emphasis on theory and restraint, the latter especially in Germanic cultures.
The changes witnessed in the US is now are mostly down to the dissipating influence of European Americans.
When you have so-called academics constantly spouting off about white privilege and that science and logic are constructs of the white man, this is the BS you're gonna get.
The results paint a similar picture to that of SAT college entrance exam performance. The high school class of 2013 showed no improvement from the previous year and fewer than half of the test takers were prepared for college-level work, according to the College Board, owner of the SAT. Concerns about academic performance of U.S. students propelled education industry and political leaders to create the Common Core State Standards Initiative, which has become controversial as states balk at increased government intervention in education.
The 2013 reading and math results are based on a nationally representative sample of students in the 12th grade. More than 92,000 students were assessed in either math or reading.
Asian/Pacific Islander students scored the highest in math, with 47 percent proficiency, followed by 33 percent of white students. Those two groups also tied at 47 percent in reading.
The achievement gap between black and white students has remained steady at about 30 points in math from 2005 to 2013. The score gap between blacks and whites in reading widened by 5 points from 1992 to 2013.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-...n-u-s-fail-to-show-reading-math-progress.html
Wouldn't the whole point of debates in college be to teach students how to debate issues properly? This is fuckin nuts. I woulda never guessed they do crap like this.
Are black people traditionally not interested in business, or are they just not applying? All I know is I can't fill out any application anywhere without having to disclose my race, gender and whether or not I have any handicap. But we live in a society where battles are fought in emotional arenas, particularly in regards to justice and social equality. But it is still industry and private enterprise that holds the wheel to change. However I can definitely see how this PC movement is slowly changing our collective cognitive map, and industry responds to consumers' needs, and so I predict...I don't know what to predict.
I am going to guess Queen's or Laval based on your location Sebchenier?
I watched this video about Towson University. The discussion is about the fact that there are dozens of ethnic student organizations which promote ethnic interests, and white students want to set up their own student union because they feel the aggressive promotion of (black/hispanic/asian) ethnic interests harms them if they do not organize themselves .
When listening to the arguments from those in the audience, I'm not surprised about the "talents" who somehow won the national debate:
[YT]?v=jGyfmhFobdM[/YT]
Was it mentioned that this is a debate format? From what I understand, the debates are scored on points made vs. points refuted, therefore, the optimal strategy is called spreading: make as many points as possible in your allotted time, making it as difficult as possible for your opponent to respond to every point that you made.
Given that this is the optimal strategy given the format (which the Towson students didn't invent, btw), why is everyone all like "...I just read this book by Nicholas Wade, and..." all of a sudden?
Presumably, if they were white kids from NYU who had won the debate format this thread wouldn't even exist, and Jared Taylor wouldn't have made an appearance.
Yikes, guys.
Outside of this Martialarts guy (who is obviously obsessed with race) and maybe a couple others, most are commenting on how retarded this so-called debate is, and how yes, if that is the format, then it's terrible. It's shouldn't be racist to point out how dumb this is.