- Joined
- Jul 12, 2007
- Messages
- 37,721
- Reaction score
- 72,003
I thought violence was outlawed in Canada.
The lawsuit with the nephews is pretty crazy. They claim Barry Sherman killed their dad in 1965. WTF - LOL.
This case is so weird, first i found out about the Sherman marriage and their company were into selling cheap farmacy drugs, first that creates a bunch of corporate enemies that are not to be taken lightly, and their own family has this things that are so strange, there are a bunch of private investigators doing a parallel investigation and they hired a coroner to do their own medical autopsy
i think this was a contract killing, this couple seemed way too happy and were married for way too long to end like this, besides they were ultra rich so what the fuck
lol, between this and the serial killer gardener chopping up dudes in planter pots, I'm thinking USA might be safer right around now.I thought violence was outlawed in Canada.
lol, between this and the serial killer gardener chopping up dudes in planter pots, I'm thinking USA might be safer right around now.
Targeted means there will be an obvious motive and thus easy suspect lists. But if somebody hired professionals, it means they have money as well and probably smart to cover their tracks.
Given it was botched by the cops to see murder-suicide, and only changed because the family hired their own PI's - basically retired homicide detectives and private forensics firms - it means no forced entry and no ransacking or theft. So it means whatever the murderer wanted wasn't in the house. And it's likely not a personal revenge issue because of the way they were murdered - no overt violence other than the strangulation - weren't beaten, raped etc. If this family wronged you and destroyed your life in some major way you'd want to make them hurt before killing them. So the motive is monetary in some way or another.
Also you have to look into where the money goes in the Will - because who gets what shows potential motive as well.
Given the bodies were not otherwise harmed and where left dead together it does lead one to believe it could be somebody known to the couple. Leaving the bodies together is a subconscious sign you cared for them - yes even if you killed them. No forced entry either means they let their killers into the House, and then not putting up a life or death fight means you believed up until the moment you died that the attacker(s) weren't going to kill you - something more likely if you knew them.
Don't forget the guy who chopped of the head of the guy in teh seat next to him on the Greyhound. He's out of jail BTW.
Fucking CANuckistan.
Wasn't there a thread on this when i happened and was being reported as suicide? The TS said no way it was the real story and got treated like a quack for pages upon pages and what do you know?
Murder. Lol.
Sucks that thread was dumped.And a bunch of shertards were like, "I'll take the word of the police and not some conspiracy minded sherdoggers".
Sucks that thread was dumped.
Thats the one, lol.And a bunch of shertards were like, "I'll take the word of the police and not some conspiracy minded sherdoggers".
He had schizophrenia.
It's in the dump. you can still post to it. just keep this one going. I expect a few curve balls.
This is totally random but I dated a girl in University who lived on the street that the murders took place on
As for the lack defensive wounds etc, it's possible they were drugged or otherwise incapacitated before being killed.
Oh ok - sounds legit to me.
He doesn't belong in jail. He was institutionalized as a criminally insane person where he was isolated from the public and receiving treatments. He wasn't of sound mind when he committed the crime so he isn't classified the same as someone who made the choice of murder.
I agree that sending him out in the general public seems scary, but Canada's track record on treating the criminally insane with low levels of recidivism is really good