Personally, I think Ronda would toss his ass and win by tko or decision.
He could never take her down, and her striking today is better than his was 20 years ago. His only advantages are size (only 25 lbs) and obviously bjj. But let's not forget that Ronda is not remotely a slouch in bjj. If she were belted in bjj right now, she'd have a black belt without question.
Someone tell me how Royce would win besides "he has testicles". Because if all you've got is "he's a man" then get out of the conversation.
People who say Royce, didn't watch ufc1 or know the history of mma at all.
Thought i'd bump this up and see what people are thinking today.
Ronda = Royce IMO. Wmma is in its infancy.
People have really forgotten two key points about UFC 1.
1) Skill sets were nowhere near well rounded. There were strikers who didn't have a clue about grappling. Grapplers who couldn't wrestle their way out of a paper bag. And Wrestlers who didn't know a thing about submissions or striking.
2) Rule set. Groin strikes. Enough said.
Rousey beats a good chunk of them simply due to many of them having NO wrestling or grappling, and holds her own against the rest due to the lack of testicles.
Pulling guard sounds great and all until Rousey is soccer kicking and punching you in the gonads.
Jimmerson gets tossed on his head and submitted very quickly. One boxing glove? Really?
People need to actually rewatch UFC 1 before they make such broad comments as "Rousey loses to all of them".