- Joined
- Dec 20, 2013
- Messages
- 19,799
- Reaction score
- 5,294
There is a difference between thinking someone should be stripped for whatever reason, and someone having been able to actually defend at that point or not. Conor couldn’t defend as he was under contract. You can’t reasonably say he should’ve been defending a belt he legally could not have at that time, that makes no sense.
You need to be more specific. I'm not sure when you are talking about.
What you really mean is that if Conor wasn’t capable of defending, as he was not with the Floyd contract owning his fighting rights at the time, then he should’ve been stripped.
That’s a much better argument then threads like these which just want to look at the total days. Total days mean nothing without context.
My post wasn't just talking about when he was under contract to fight Floyd. But in regards to that fight again why should an MMA fan care about his boxing match? He is still holding up a division in MMA and if he wants to justify that shit by saying he is "active" then he should honor that with a quick turn around which he is not doing. He is sitting on his ass counting his money.