- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 30,389
- Reaction score
- 0
The fact that you believe that is telling. Ultimately there is no right and wrong here. Its simply a matter of priorities. I view this as a sport, whose entertainment value comes from the high level of competition itself. You view it as a spectacle, where anything that can garner ratings and buys is a legit avenue to explore
Who said anybody was "wrong" about whether they liked the fight (or not)?
You also have no idea what I view anything as.
You are assuming & projecting.
I don't think Brock deserves a title shot, but I am not ignorant enough to think my opinion is the majority or correct thing to do as a business.
99.99% of those complaining would do the same fight if it was their business.
I explained my thinking about major sports & how they make decisions I dislike based on money. So if you assume what you did, you either missed that post or did not comprehend it.
You also might not know the history of combat sports.
Ali fought many guys that were not ranked #1.
He fought Chuck Wepner who was nothing more than a can, because they wanted a white guy to exploit as a challenger for a guy named Muhammad Ali.
That was far worse than an ex champ getting a shot & for far worse reasons
That was 40+ years ago too.
I'm just smart enough to understand why these fights get made & think logically that they will continue & don't hide my head in the sand that "Prize Fighting is altruistic"