He's trying to jinx it. Tito playing mind games with the universe
lol tito is amazing. He is the only one who holds any credence to his record. Look at those HUGE names he fought off to keep that title:
Yuki Kondo
Vlad matyushenko
evan tanner
48 year old Ken Shamrock
elvis sinosic
Chael was not a champ in WEC and has never been a solid top 10 LHW fighter.
What Tito is really doing is finding a way to make tonight's fight about him. I'm sure, if he was still on good terms with the UFC, he'd have found a way to make an in-octagon post-fight appearance to talk about how he made this all possible.
Compare that to Rampage, Machida, Rashad, Vitor Belfort and Sonnen. All those guys were champions at one point in time (Sonnen was champ in WEC and regardless of people may think about him is a solid top ten fighter). He also beat Shogun to capture the title in the first place. Jones is already the greatest LHW of all time. Others were disagreeing with me on this point last month, but the facts are the facts. Jones has fought tougher competition to keep his belt than any other former LHW champion (i.e. Tito or Chuck).
Chael was not a champ in WEC and has never been a solid top 10 LHW fighter.
Tito is saying whatever needs to be said to bring attention to himself.
I still chuckle sometimes when Tito boasts about his record. Dude was beating up average MW. Jones has smashed the likes of Bonnar, Bader, Shogun, Vitor, Vladdy, Rashad, Rampage, etc
Technically- he did beat Filho in their title match- but Filho missed weight, and so it was ruled a non-title fight. Sonnen dominated Paulo Filho, and afterwards Filho and Soares shipped Sonnen the MW title of WEC. The MW division of WEC afterwards soon was dissolved, but Chael still had the belt and was the champ in the eyes of the MMA world.
Jones has the benefited fro all the years of fighting knowledge build up by those same fighters he smashed. Please put it into context.
The best fighters were in Pride at the time for the most part, so getting good challengers for their champs was tough. But considering that Tito beat their 205 (or 203 as it were) champion, you can definitely make the case that he was the best at the time or at least among the best. When you add it all up, Tito fought and often beat some good fighters.lol tito is amazing. He is the only one who holds any credence to his record. Look at those HUGE names he fought off to keep that title:
Yuki Kondo
Vlad matyushenko
evan tanner
48 year old Ken Shamrock
elvis sinosic
Your post is a little dumb. Tito beat all the guys you metioned except for shogun and rampage, who he will beat soon. And he beat vladdy, vitor, and rashad when they were younger and more athletic than the ones jones beat.
P.s. I know he lost to rashad, but in the first fight he won it if the ref wouldn't have taken a point for grabbing the cage one time. Most warn then take a point on the third time. Also I didn't bring up bonner cause he sucks.
But Tito beat Vitor and Mezger anyway and there's no guarantee he would have lost to those other guys.It gets worse when you compare him to Chuck's record at the time.
Tito was NEVER champ IMO. Technically he was, but the champ is SUPPOSED to be the best, and he was NOT the best when he was champ. While he was "defending" his title against those guys you mentioned, Chuck Liddell beat these guys:
Jeff Monson (6-2 at the time)
Kevin Randeman (9-4)
Guy Mezger (28-11-2)
Bustamante (undefeated 7-0-1 at the time)
Suloev (13-2)
Vitor (10-2)
Babalu (20-4)
Tito essentially ducked Chuck with excuses, while Chuck eliminated the real contenders himself.
ANY of those guys might have beat Tito at the time if they had a chance, but Chuck kept knocking them off for Tito.