why not?
this is a long standing rule and it is clear thoughYeah this is the new rules. But apparently now its just the ref's call. We have three different refs giving three different opinions. I guess big John is the opinion that matters the most. Still what a waste.
That's the fucking VP of Regulatory affairs. im blown away he didn't knowNo. That's a downed opponent. Stupid rule, but Rogan and that commission idiot are just wrong
Then why all of the confusion. You used to have one hand down. Then they switched to the three points system. Someone made a good point in another thread in that a foot a knee and a foot is three points technically.this is a long standing rule and it is clear though
that's 3 points. knee foot and the other foot (toes)
but oliveira milked it
pretty sure I saw a big john video that talk the opposite of thatI don't think you can count multiple points on the same leg. It's either a knee or a foot being counted as a "point", not both.
I don't think you can count multiple points on the same leg. It's either a knee or a foot being counted as a "point", not both.
pretty sure I saw a big john video that talk the opposite of that
but I think he will tweet later about this fight and talk about the rule
pretty sure I saw a big john video that talk the opposite of that
but I think he will tweet later about this fight and talk about the rule
Unified rules
yeah, that's rightIf that were the case you wouldn't need a hand down in the first place, no? I can't see a way in which you could have your knee down without also having your foot down on that same leg.
Source?
Emphasis mine.If any part of the body besides the soles of feet are touching the mat you are down. That's the simplest I can explain it but if that don;t do I'll go further.
DRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR....because it ALWAYS has been illegal to knee/kick someone on a knee.hows that a downed opponent lmao Mirgliota fucked up