- Joined
- Mar 29, 2009
- Messages
- 8,316
- Reaction score
- 0
I can't believe "Full Kit Wankers" has caught on in the MMA crowd. That's brilliant.
The term has, but I have yet to see a fan wearing a kit in public.
I can't believe "Full Kit Wankers" has caught on in the MMA crowd. That's brilliant.
Bellator got the spike tv deal when UFC went to fox and has done fairly good numbersHe could be shelved, meaning he would have to sue them to have any chance of ever competing again. I'm not sure if he signed a new deal once Strikeforce was bought out. Part of me believes the UFC would force every fighter coming from the Strikeforce roster to amend their contract, but who knows. He's either stuck due to contractual obligations, or the money he might make in Bellator may not be all that great. Strikeforce was at least doing shows on national TV, I don't even think I've ever seen a Bellator advertisement anywhere.
The Kennedy curse is real!
The term has, but I have yet to see a fan wearing a kit in public.
The term has, but I have yet to see a fan wearing a kit in public.
If you do, it's your responsibility to "out them", but taking a photo and posting it. It's the only way to shame these "wankers" into not wearing stupid sports "kits".
I went to Bisping v Leites and I definitely seen a few.
I believe the proper search term would be "Kneddeny".
Remember, it's Reebok.
And you did nothing?
Nah...I don't think it's anything sinister. They want to sell these internationally...so instead of uniform/jersey/etc, they're using a broader international term.
Have they sold any of these things?
Has anyone on here seen an actual person, non fighter walking around in public wearing one?
Reebok and the UFC are children.
Why is it call a "fight kit"? Isn't it just basically a t shirt?
Problem there is I am sure a sponsor pays more to be in the UFC than Bellator, the numbers won't be the same