- Joined
- Jul 23, 2010
- Messages
- 4,433
- Reaction score
- 660
1. Won't matter as shown when they fought Wonderboy.
2. That's why Till will miss weight.
Thoughts?
2. That's why Till will miss weight.
Thoughts?
1. Won't matter as shown when they fought Wonderboy.
2. That's why Till will miss weight.
Thoughts?
My ass he's bigger Woodley walks at 205+ and they have the same reach it's only a height difference. Look at how much thicker and built Woodley is. Look at the size of his fucking thighs. They're the size of Till's chest. Woodley is the stronger, more powerful and more explosive guy yet he's supposed to be the smaller guy? Also Woodley has already fought ""big"" guys, Wonderboy was the same height.
You mean always making weight?Till trying to be Jon Jones.
Google says they both have a 74" reach. Regardless the size thing is being overblown. Woodley is not tall but he's fucking built like a tank, has great reach and he's been fighting taller guys his whole career. If people are giving Till the advantage because of this they are in for a shock.I agree that Woodley's build is much more powerful than Till's but those reach stats aren't accurate at all. Till's got about the same reach as Wonderboy who had a clear range advantage on Woodley.
Exactly. I don’t know if people will ever learn that mass equals size. Not length and height.My ass he's bigger Woodley walks at 205+ and they have the same reach it's only a height difference. Look at how much thicker and built Woodley is. Look at the size of his fucking thighs. They're the size of Till's chest. Woodley is the stronger, more powerful and more explosive guy yet he's supposed to be the smaller guy? Also Woodley has already fought ""big"" guys, Wonderboy was the same height.
Google says they both have a 74" reach. Regardless the size thing is being overblown. Woodley is not tall but he's fucking built like a tank, has great reach and he's been fighting taller guys his whole career. If people are giving Till the advantage because of this they are in for a shock.
Exactly. I don’t know if people will ever learn that mass equals size. Not length and height.
I agree, there are more factors, and Till is bigger, but it’s a lot closer than people say. Like I’ve also said before, the huge cut he’s going to make could likely result in evening out the size advantage that he does have.What you guys are saying is only partially correct.
Yes, the difference we see in the staredown is due to the fact that Till has a much bigger frame (height, bone structure wise), and mass-wise, there is much closer gap due to Woodley having the density in his muscles.
There IS a significant difference between someone who's packing a lot of muscle for his frame and walks around at maybe 190 - 200 lbs (Woodley) and a guy who has naturally a bigger frame that walks around at 200 - 210 lbs (Till).
A more extreme example of this comparison would be Hector Lombard & Anthony Johnson. Both fought as a welter weight. The former was a really thick dude who basically maxed out on his muscle mass for his frame, while the latter - well, we all know - eventually filled out his frame and competed at LHW with no size disadvantage.
Till could easily compete as a decently-sized MW, while Woodley would probably be undersized as a MW. That's the difference.
I agree, there are more factors, and Till is bigger, but it’s a lot closer than people say. Like I’ve also said before, the huge cut he’s going to make could likely result in evening out the size advantage that he does have.
Yep, it's an exciting matchup, imo. I think Till is going to engage and bring out the fight in Woodley.I agree with that. I'm just hoping he actually does make the weight.