Drew Foster
Silver Belt
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2008
- Messages
- 11,759
- Reaction score
- 1
I definitely have different games for each side. I'm like Marcelo with the righty Guillotines and N-S chokes. I'm ambi on the RNC. If someone is turtled for example, and I'm on their left side, I'm almost always going to attack the Darce or some head-and-arm choke. If I'm on the other side I'm probably going to try to take the back. If I do take the back facing their left side as they're turtled, it's almost always with the crucifix. Ambi Darces, right Anacondas, left arm triangles.
I do right sided Triangles, but I will do a left Triangle off the hip-bump or Flower sweep. That's it though. From top-side I usually Keylock one side, Kimura the other, etc. Ambi armbars.
Certain passes and sweeps go to certain sides, etc. Reverse heel-hooks on the right leg, straight footlocks on the left leg, the list goes on.
I'm all over the fucking place man.
So my question is, and I need to read more on this Hicks' law, but do you think it's better to:
A- Practice back-and-forth between sides to develop ambi all along
B- have two different games for each side
C- Learn one side, then transfer the knowledge
I do right sided Triangles, but I will do a left Triangle off the hip-bump or Flower sweep. That's it though. From top-side I usually Keylock one side, Kimura the other, etc. Ambi armbars.
Certain passes and sweeps go to certain sides, etc. Reverse heel-hooks on the right leg, straight footlocks on the left leg, the list goes on.
I'm all over the fucking place man.
So my question is, and I need to read more on this Hicks' law, but do you think it's better to:
A- Practice back-and-forth between sides to develop ambi all along
B- have two different games for each side
C- Learn one side, then transfer the knowledge