PED issues aside, Cyborg supporters claimed Cyborg was more legit than Ronda the "hype train" yet Ronda's resume is much better and Ronda has fought 5-6 fighters who are the same level or higher than Cyborg's best opponent while Cyborg's resume is full of fighters with records at the time she fought them like 5-1, 6-1, 6-2, 6-4, 8-6, and 8-7 and her best wins are mostly from more than 6 years ago. The only measure by which Cyborg can possibly be more legit is the often biased "eye test" and that's not actual evidence of anything or ever used as a primary criteria for determining GOAT/P4P status for other fighters. People just looked for a heroine to save them from the "evil" Ronda but took it to such lengths they completely discarded the normal standards for judging fighters that involve RESUMES, they wanted so badly to rebel against "hype"/the popular thing like hipsters but ended up falling for a more unjustified hype with much less substance. Even fighters like Tate and Nunes have better resumes than Cyborg yet Cyborg was given more respect than them for NO valid reason by these supposedly knowledgeable hardcore fan hipsters. WAR resumes! Resume bless.