This Election Isn't Democrats vs Republicans, It's Globalists vs Nationalists

To a degree, yes. You definitely could see the split in both parties
 
Leroy Jenkins said:
They were bad, no question about it...Reminds me of the United States committing genocide against the Natives.
Click to expand...


The US didn't commit genocide on the Natives, the colonists did. Fuck sakes, read a book and stop besmirching yourself.
 
TheStruggle said:
The US didn't commit genocide on the Natives, the colonists did. Fuck sakes, read a book and stop besmirching yourself.
Click to expand...

Yeah we did. Plenty of stuff happened after we became the U.S.
 
uncommon said:
1391843_594243617291414_1995187470_n.jpg
Click to expand...

Mao didn't win revolution till 1949. He was engaged in civil war in the 30's and then Japan invaded. Hitler relaxed gun laws considerably in Germany for non-Jews.
 
panamaican said:
Yeah we did. Plenty of stuff happened after we became the U.S.
Click to expand...

Let's not pretend that the natives weren't murdering each other for conquest among themselves though. No population or organism on earth is innocent of having ancestors that killed for pleasure or necessity.
 
Diamond Jim said:
He was engaged in civil war in the 30's and then Japan invaded. Hitler relaxed gun laws considerably in Germany for non-Jews.
Click to expand...

No he didn't. He just opened up access to those supporting his party. That's a valuable lesson to consider, because often its not the administration that initially takes away arms from the citizenry that's also the tyrannical one who commits the democide.
 
Greoric said:
No he didn't. He just opened up access to those supporting his party. That's a valuable lesson to consider, because often its not the administration that initially takes away arms from the citizenry that's also the tyrannical one who commits the democide.
Click to expand...

Nazi's had benefits surely with some restrictions in licenses, but gun laws in 38' drastically eased in Germany. Licenses were extended for years, deregulation of long rifles and shotguns, age limits dropped. Considering what they were in the 20's, they eased.
 
Diamond Jim said:
Nazi's had benefits surely with some restrictions in licenses, but gun laws in 38' drastically eased in Germany. Licenses were extended for years, deregulation of long rifles and shotguns, age limits dropped. Considering what they were in the 20's, they eased.
Click to expand...

How are you defining drastically? They were eased for the ruling class. The people that were able to arm themselves were the ones in power, not the ones who were persecuted. That's not any kind reform that can be considered an ease to the access of arms. That's just exacerbating the power gap between those doing the oppressing and those being oppressed.

The reason for easing gun restrictions in order for all classes of people have the same or similar access to weaponry so that one group can't uniformly dominate the rest... like we saw in National Socialist Germany.
 
Last edited:
banning guns? honestly, I dont care too much.

globalist policy of bringing in a bunch of syrians or mexicans to cheapen american labor even more? No thanks.
 
Both sides support consumerism i.e. capitalism. You should also substitute secularism for atheism/paganism. Also, the matriarchy/patriarchy split doesn't quite fit. Nationalists are in general more hawkish as well. Not a bad way to look at the race though.
 
Greoric said:
Let's not pretend that the natives weren't murdering each other for conquest among themselves though. No population or organism on earth is innocent of having ancestors that killed for pleasure or necessity.
Click to expand...

None of that changes that his statement was factually incorrect.
 
I see the issues with globalization but as the world becomes more intertwined and populations grow, travel becomes quicker and cheaper etc something akin to globalization will need to be considered. We can already communicate instantly with some one on the other side of the world thanks to technology.
 
M3t4tr0n said:
I see the issues with globalization but as the world becomes more intertwined and populations grow, travel becomes quicker and cheaper etc something akin to globalization will need to be considered. We can already communicate instantly with some one on the other side of the world thanks to technology.
Click to expand...

There are no issues with globalization...only issues with people who can't deal with change.

Like you noted, we can already communicate instantly with someone on the other side of the world. So many of of our most transformative inventions exist primarily to shrink the world. We are a social species and improving communication is the one thing we're always working on doing better.

Some people just can't deal with what that means in other areas of their lives.
 
M3t4tr0n said:
I see the issues with globalization but as the world becomes more intertwined and populations grow, travel becomes quicker and cheaper etc something akin to globalization will need to be considered. We can already communicate instantly with some one on the other side of the world thanks to technology.
Click to expand...

Yeah I think all those are awesome things. We should be doing everything we can to lower the barriers to trade. I find its kind of funny that the democrats in this election are the ones about greater free trade, and Trump is running on a plan of greater economic isolation.

The part of globalization that's concerning for me is the one world government.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,906
Messages
55,454,165
Members
174,786
Latest member
ljae89

Share this page

Back
Top