Fair enough.
But as a counter I’d say this article “a call for balance” on CTE reporting was signed off by 60 Neurologists, only 4 or 5 of them disclosed a conflict of interest as them being affiliated with a major sports org.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422(19)30020-1/fulltext
If anything ever gets out about them accepting money from a sports org their career is over.
With regards to Lili-Naz Hazrati.
She has been featured in a New York Times article which might have been the one you found. This was condemned in the Lancet article, singled out as probably the most misrepresentative piece of media aside from the Hollywood film.
The Washington Post actually did a decent piece on CTE a couple of weeks ago;
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/sports/cte-bennet-omalu/
They said this of a CTE diagnosis;
“Omalu often uses the phrase tested positive for CTE, implying the process is black and white, akin to a pregnancy test. In reality, diagnosing CTE is far more complicated, more like looking out into a starry night and spotting a constellation”.
I believe the case you are talking about with Hazrati being contradicted by her colleagues is the Todd Ewen case. Hazrati did her testing of the Ewen brain and found no CTE, she then sent it out to five other Neuropathologists who all found no CTE.
The Ewen brain was sent to Boston university who found CTE. They then sent a scan or pictures of their findings to the Mayo clinic who said that looks like CTE but they weren’t sent the full Ewen brain.
So Hazrati was in the majority when she couldn’t find CTE. Professor Rudy Castellani speculated that the region of the frontal lobe that looked affected was likely the region people with epilepsy get taken out and don’t notice hence the other Neuropathologists didn’t look that closely at the area.