Media The Weasle's take on Khabib Vs Gleison

You mean clinging to a guy repeatedly and just stalling the fight as opposed to the standup fight Tibau wanted?
tibau wasn't winning the stand up fight either, the best shot he landed where near the clinch, not in striking range. Tibau tried to clinch khabib too, but wasn't as near effective. If tibau wanted the stand up fight, he wouldn't ve tried to take khabib down. Tibau was waiting to counter with a fight ending shot the entire fight, shot which never came, or maybe did ( the huge knee ) but khabib has a granite chin.

Khabib won, deal with it.

no CTE, not even bleeding in a fight, multi-millionaire, influencer, hero of the nation, undefeated, undisputed, LW champion of the world, no1 p4p fighter in the world, 29-0.
 
Round 1 Tibau doubled Khabib in total strikes landed, defended all takedown attempts, and spent over 3 minutes of the round walking Khabib down. Easy round for Tibau.

Round 2 the striking was much closer with Khabib having a narrow advantage. No takedowns from either guy, close round, but this one goes to Khabib.

Round 3 Tibau nearly doubled Khabib in strikes landed again and completes the only takedown of the fight. Khabib gets stuffed in his only takedown attempt this round. Easy round for Tibau.

The judges got this one wrong.
R1 Khabib did more damage. He opened a cut on Tibau right eye and was landing the harder strikes.

In R2 and R3 Khabib was making that cut worse with strikes
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20201107-101124_Gallery.jpg
    Screenshot_20201107-101124_Gallery.jpg
    316.6 KB · Views: 2
R1 Khabib did more damage. He opened a cut on Tibau right eye and was landing the harder strikes.

In R2 and R3 Khabib was making that cut worse with strikes

Opening a minor cut doesn’t make up for getting doubled in strikes landed.
 
Opening a minor cut doesn’t make up for getting doubled in strikes landed.
Doubled?
Strikes were pretty even with Khabib landing the harder shots.

He clearly did the more damage because Khabib's face was unmarked as always lol
 
Fuck khabib fans firstly..

The judges got this one so and so.. but they have gotten things more wrong than this..

One man failed at his objective all fight and one succeded.. the failing man won..

However i'm glad khabib won since tibau wasn't human at that point and the exact antidote to that version of khabib.. this khabib would ko him and the undefeated record adds to the aura..
 
look how thick tibau is. its unreal.
 
Very interesting, so in a fight where one guy's entire goal was to take another man down, and he got zero takedowns, yet he himself got taken down twice, he still wins because he....tried harder? A for effort is a judging criteria in MMA, very interesting.

Perhaps we should value how many pass attempts QBs have or how many shots a basketball player takes rather than simply counting when they actually score. Or time of possession because it shows "field control".
I love how Takedowns that lead to absolutely NOTHING only matters when it's against Khabib.
 
Very interesting, so in a fight where one guy's entire goal was to take another man down, and he got zero takedowns, yet he himself got taken down twice, he still wins because he....tried harder? A for effort is a judging criteria in MMA, very interesting.

Perhaps we should value how many pass attempts QBs have or how many shots a basketball player takes rather than simply counting when they actually score. Or time of possession because it shows "field control".
But of course. Those QBs and NBA shooters clearly wanted it more.
 
I watched that fight twice, Tibau didn't win, it was just close which is unusual when Khabib fights. Khabib won via pressuring Tibau and being the aggressor of the fight.

And I agree about Rogan is being biased, he did the same thing in the Al Iaquinta fight as well.
 
Very interesting, so in a fight where one guy's entire goal was to take another man down, and he got zero takedowns, yet he himself got taken down twice, he still wins because he....tried harder? A for effort is a judging criteria in MMA, very interesting.

Perhaps we should value how many pass attempts QBs have or how many shots a basketball player takes rather than simply counting when they actually score. Or time of possession because it shows "field control".
Did Tibau get pressed against the cage the whole fight in order to win? Who was in more control? That's the argument
 
  • Like
Reactions: HHJ
Very interesting, so in a fight where one guy's entire goal was to take another man down, and he got zero takedowns, yet he himself got taken down twice, he still wins because he....tried harder? A for effort is a judging criteria in MMA, very interesting.

Perhaps we should value how many pass attempts QBs have or how many shots a basketball player takes rather than simply counting when they actually score. Or time of possession because it shows "field control".

Is this you?

maxresdefault.jpg
 
Very interesting, so in a fight where one guy's entire goal was to take another man down, and he got zero takedowns, yet he himself got taken down twice, he still wins because he....tried harder? A for effort is a judging criteria in MMA, very interesting.

Perhaps we should value how many pass attempts QBs have or how many shots a basketball player takes rather than simply counting when they actually score. Or time of possession because it shows "field control".
So a guy should win by staying with his back on the fence and defending the entire time? Tibau did nothing with those tskedowns,khabib got right back up and kept going on the offensive
 
Very interesting, so in a fight where one guy's entire goal was to take another man down, and he got zero takedowns, yet he himself got taken down twice, he still wins because he....tried harder? A for effort is a judging criteria in MMA, very interesting.

Perhaps we should value how many pass attempts QBs have or how many shots a basketball player takes rather than simply counting when they actually score. Or time of possession because it shows "field control".
Except Tibau outstruck him and took HIM down as well lmfao
 
You're simply recalling that octagon control is considered a possible factor, but it shouldn't even come into play for this fight since Tibau won the takedown battle.
not-sure-if-serious.gif
If you're trolling, ok.
If you're serious and eagerly pressing your stopwatch to say the literally <5 seconds of ground time for the whole fight = Tibau "winning the takedown battle" then I guess you're free to take that position ha.
 
Back
Top