- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
- Messages
- 2,342
- Reaction score
- 3,876
Tibau scored only one (1) takedown. The other wasn't counted as a takedown because it wasn't a takedown.ACTUALLY SCORING TWO TAKEDOWNS.
He didn't nothing with his takedown
Tibau scored only one (1) takedown. The other wasn't counted as a takedown because it wasn't a takedown.ACTUALLY SCORING TWO TAKEDOWNS.
tibau wasn't winning the stand up fight either, the best shot he landed where near the clinch, not in striking range. Tibau tried to clinch khabib too, but wasn't as near effective. If tibau wanted the stand up fight, he wouldn't ve tried to take khabib down. Tibau was waiting to counter with a fight ending shot the entire fight, shot which never came, or maybe did ( the huge knee ) but khabib has a granite chin.You mean clinging to a guy repeatedly and just stalling the fight as opposed to the standup fight Tibau wanted?
R1 Khabib did more damage. He opened a cut on Tibau right eye and was landing the harder strikes.Round 1 Tibau doubled Khabib in total strikes landed, defended all takedown attempts, and spent over 3 minutes of the round walking Khabib down. Easy round for Tibau.
Round 2 the striking was much closer with Khabib having a narrow advantage. No takedowns from either guy, close round, but this one goes to Khabib.
Round 3 Tibau nearly doubled Khabib in strikes landed again and completes the only takedown of the fight. Khabib gets stuffed in his only takedown attempt this round. Easy round for Tibau.
The judges got this one wrong.
R1 Khabib did more damage. He opened a cut on Tibau right eye and was landing the harder strikes.
In R2 and R3 Khabib was making that cut worse with strikes
Doubled?Opening a minor cut doesn’t make up for getting doubled in strikes landed.
I love how Takedowns that lead to absolutely NOTHING only matters when it's against Khabib.Very interesting, so in a fight where one guy's entire goal was to take another man down, and he got zero takedowns, yet he himself got taken down twice, he still wins because he....tried harder? A for effort is a judging criteria in MMA, very interesting.
Perhaps we should value how many pass attempts QBs have or how many shots a basketball player takes rather than simply counting when they actually score. Or time of possession because it shows "field control".
But of course. Those QBs and NBA shooters clearly wanted it more.Very interesting, so in a fight where one guy's entire goal was to take another man down, and he got zero takedowns, yet he himself got taken down twice, he still wins because he....tried harder? A for effort is a judging criteria in MMA, very interesting.
Perhaps we should value how many pass attempts QBs have or how many shots a basketball player takes rather than simply counting when they actually score. Or time of possession because it shows "field control".
I remember the guy saying he’d beat some flyweights/bantamweights in the ufc. He’s no sherdoggerThe weasle is a joke. Guy knows literally nothing about fighting
Did Tibau get pressed against the cage the whole fight in order to win? Who was in more control? That's the argumentVery interesting, so in a fight where one guy's entire goal was to take another man down, and he got zero takedowns, yet he himself got taken down twice, he still wins because he....tried harder? A for effort is a judging criteria in MMA, very interesting.
Perhaps we should value how many pass attempts QBs have or how many shots a basketball player takes rather than simply counting when they actually score. Or time of possession because it shows "field control".
Very interesting, so in a fight where one guy's entire goal was to take another man down, and he got zero takedowns, yet he himself got taken down twice, he still wins because he....tried harder? A for effort is a judging criteria in MMA, very interesting.
Perhaps we should value how many pass attempts QBs have or how many shots a basketball player takes rather than simply counting when they actually score. Or time of possession because it shows "field control".
So a guy should win by staying with his back on the fence and defending the entire time? Tibau did nothing with those tskedowns,khabib got right back up and kept going on the offensiveVery interesting, so in a fight where one guy's entire goal was to take another man down, and he got zero takedowns, yet he himself got taken down twice, he still wins because he....tried harder? A for effort is a judging criteria in MMA, very interesting.
Perhaps we should value how many pass attempts QBs have or how many shots a basketball player takes rather than simply counting when they actually score. Or time of possession because it shows "field control".
Except Tibau outstruck him and took HIM down as well lmfaoVery interesting, so in a fight where one guy's entire goal was to take another man down, and he got zero takedowns, yet he himself got taken down twice, he still wins because he....tried harder? A for effort is a judging criteria in MMA, very interesting.
Perhaps we should value how many pass attempts QBs have or how many shots a basketball player takes rather than simply counting when they actually score. Or time of possession because it shows "field control".
not-sure-if-serious.gifYou're simply recalling that octagon control is considered a possible factor, but it shouldn't even come into play for this fight since Tibau won the takedown battle.