- Joined
- Sep 26, 2013
- Messages
- 4,644
- Reaction score
- 19
I'll try to be quick with this, because we're clearly just going round in circles, but...
I didn't explain myself clearly. I'm not trying to say that Jones shouldn't work on his boxing, or it's not a flaw in his game, I'm saying that all I care about with a fighter is, "are they effective?" And Jones is most definitely that, despite having flaws in his boxing.
I'm all about efficient, effective domination. Don't care how they do it, just that they do.
I like seeing fighters maximize the various gifts they have. Jones does that. So does Conor.
The first round was close, it's not like Machida blew him out of the water.
In the second round, Jones caught Machida with a hard hook on the feet, rocking/stunning him, which allowed him to get inside to get the TD. The subsequent TD and elbow most definitely changed the flow of the fight, but a strike on the feet set it up. Don't act like Jones had no success standing.
I don't ignore that at all. Why would I? It's obvious. Just as it's obvious that Gus is larger than Shogun too.
Failed miserably... and won?
It was a close fight, which you clearly think that Gus won, but regardless, neither fighter performed miserably that night. It was a very tight, very tough fight. I agree with the judges. Jones did enough to win. He landed the harder, more damaging strikes.
I did name you a fighter.
Dan Hornbuckle. 6'2", 83.5" reach. Welterweight. Only two inches shorter than Jones, one inch less reach, but two weight classes lower. That's an even bigger advantage than Jones has.
I'll name some more fighters, shall I?
How about Cyrille Diabate? 6'6", 81.5" reach. LHW. Same weight class as Jones, similar dimensions... nowhere near similar results.
Bigfoot Silva? 6'4", 83" reach. Cuts to HW. So, he's huge. Weird, all that reach and size didn't mean dick against Cormier.
Look, I'm not trying to discount Jones' reach advantage, all I'm saying is that's not all he has. If it all it took to be successful in MMA was to have a freakishly long frame, guys like Dan Hornbuckle would be champions. But they're not. Because it takes far more than that. It takes talent, skill, hard work, incredible fight IQ and heart/will... and Jones has all of that in spades.
Jones didn't get to be one of the best active fighters just by having long limbs.
Youre post essentially boils down to:
"I dont care that his boxing is subpar. I dont care that hes just reach...na na na na doesnt matter" etc
Its like, hello. Its ALL ABOUT HIS REACH. His boxing being SUB PAR IS A BIG THING... as the Gus fight proved.
how convenient, any of Jones flaws simply don't matter to you and no one should care...BUT we should praise his "MMA game" and everything else....
I didn't explain myself clearly. I'm not trying to say that Jones shouldn't work on his boxing, or it's not a flaw in his game, I'm saying that all I care about with a fighter is, "are they effective?" And Jones is most definitely that, despite having flaws in his boxing.
I'm all about efficient, effective domination. Don't care how they do it, just that they do.
I like seeing fighters maximize the various gifts they have. Jones does that. So does Conor.
Also, Machida won the first round against Jones purely on the feet. Jomes had to get a TD to change the momentum of the fight and simply went on to catch Machida
The first round was close, it's not like Machida blew him out of the water.
In the second round, Jones caught Machida with a hard hook on the feet, rocking/stunning him, which allowed him to get inside to get the TD. The subsequent TD and elbow most definitely changed the flow of the fight, but a strike on the feet set it up. Don't act like Jones had no success standing.
Theres ASLO ONE BIG FACT youre ignoring, Shogun and Machida WERE FAR SMALLER than Jones. Jones beat them via his size and reach
I don't ignore that at all. Why would I? It's obvious. Just as it's obvious that Gus is larger than Shogun too.
Like I SAID GUS was the first to match Jones in size so It finally came down to skill vs skill with Jones and Jones failed miserably without his size and reach advantages to rely on. Thats the point
Failed miserably... and won?
It was a close fight, which you clearly think that Gus won, but regardless, neither fighter performed miserably that night. It was a very tight, very tough fight. I agree with the judges. Jones did enough to win. He landed the harder, more damaging strikes.
YOU NAME ME ONE fighter who was as big for their division as Jones is for LHW. Exactly
Per fight Jones averages more reach, height, and weight over his opponents THAN ANY ONE in MMA ever
Thats WHY Jones size and reach are a huge deal for him
I did name you a fighter.
Dan Hornbuckle. 6'2", 83.5" reach. Welterweight. Only two inches shorter than Jones, one inch less reach, but two weight classes lower. That's an even bigger advantage than Jones has.
I'll name some more fighters, shall I?
How about Cyrille Diabate? 6'6", 81.5" reach. LHW. Same weight class as Jones, similar dimensions... nowhere near similar results.
Bigfoot Silva? 6'4", 83" reach. Cuts to HW. So, he's huge. Weird, all that reach and size didn't mean dick against Cormier.
Look, I'm not trying to discount Jones' reach advantage, all I'm saying is that's not all he has. If it all it took to be successful in MMA was to have a freakishly long frame, guys like Dan Hornbuckle would be champions. But they're not. Because it takes far more than that. It takes talent, skill, hard work, incredible fight IQ and heart/will... and Jones has all of that in spades.
Jones didn't get to be one of the best active fighters just by having long limbs.