I know this subject has been talked about a lot, a lot a lot a lot but I just want to see if I can start a intelligent conversation.
And there lies the problem. My definition of a great striker might very from someone else's. I might say "well if they can hit their opponent and shut down there game plan with out getting hit back that's a good striker."
Someone else might say"man this guys knocks everybody out no matter how bad his opponent beats them up".
Or we might all say "an early/late knock out shows most dominance."
Brawler, counter puncher, tactician, Kickboxer, Thai fighters, who have been the most successful strikers in the UFC?
And there lies the problem. My definition of a great striker might very from someone else's. I might say "well if they can hit their opponent and shut down there game plan with out getting hit back that's a good striker."
Someone else might say"man this guys knocks everybody out no matter how bad his opponent beats them up".
Or we might all say "an early/late knock out shows most dominance."
Brawler, counter puncher, tactician, Kickboxer, Thai fighters, who have been the most successful strikers in the UFC?