The UFC mentality of "money > legitimacy" is very dangerous for the sport

Over and out**

Blue Belt
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
789
Reaction score
0
The way UFC is doing business right now makes it obvious that the UFC no longer cares about the legitimacy of the sport, and is not afraid to risk their credibility to draw the most amount of viewers possible. Dana white and the Ferttitas no longer care about the longevity of the sport. Instead they want to cash out as much as they can before the UFC is viewed as a joke.

Undeserved title shots/questionable match making:

Chael Sonnen vs Jon Jones. Chael had absolutely ZERO business fighting for a LHW TITLE. ZERO. we all know UFC did this fight to pull TUF ratings, and had to trick viewers into believing that this is actually a "fight that the fans have been screaming for." Complete joke of a fight.

GSP vs Nick Diaz: here we had Jonnny Hendricks riding a big streak with wins over Fitch, Koscheck, Pierce, Kampman. Most logical fans predicted that he would be next in line for GSP. But the title shot instead goes to "bad boy" Nick Diaz riding a massive 0-1 streak, who also happened to be suspended for 1 year due to testing positive for pot.

Anderson Silva vs Stephan Bonnar: not even going to waste my time talking about this.

shafting "boring" fighters.

if you are considered a "boring" fighter or don't have a charismatic personality, prepare to be cut if you lose just 1 fight, no matter how skilled you are.

Jon Fitch being the prime example of this.

The guy was a top 10 welterweight and goes 1-1-1 in 3 fights and gets billed to be on the "downside of his career" and gets cut. meanwhile you have the Leonard Garcias (who was and still is on a massive losing streak, just recently cut), and the Pat Barrys (4 of his last 6 opponents aren't even in the UFC anymore, and he lost to 2 of the 4 guys that were cut) hanging around in the UFC because they "come to bang"

tl/dr
The UFC no longer cares about your skill level, or how high you are ranked. No matter how bad of a fighter you are, the UFC will keep you around if you can put asses in seats. The UFC is going in the direction of pro wrestling and while this is profitable in the short run, the UFC is going to be viewed as a joke many years down the road if it doesn't change its ways.
 
Last edited:
Bruh you're like 5 months late on this thread
 
this is a balancing act....

to legitimize MMA and the UFC product with the masses they need to sell tickets and put asses in the seats, sometimes sport becomes a casualty to entertainment for this purpose...

Cream always rises to the top and hence the best fighters will always keep winning and getting their show to become the best...

example Benson Henderson is not a marketable draw but has won the last four lightweight title fights against arguably 3 fighters in Edgar, Nate Diaz and Melendez all of which would probably sell more PPV wise than Hendo
 
this is a balancing act....

This. The UFC is well aware they will have the lions-share of talent in the foreseeable future so they are stretching their legs as far as making attractive fights even if they're not necessarily appealing to the rankings of "hard-core fans".

I got no problem with this business model as long as they keep shit balanced.
 
LOL. It's Promotion 101.

GSP/Diaz did 1 Million + buys, and Sonnen/Jones did 550,000 buys.

It's all about the fights people want to see. Not one shit is given about legitimacy in the UFC by DFW

/thread
 
Bruh you're like 5 months late on this thread
I dont think so, since this a tendency and i foresee that undeserving tittle matchs and horrible match ups that prioritize profit instead of the legitimacy of MMa as a sport WILL happen again as soon as possible.
 
I dont think so, since this a tendency and i foresee that undeserving tittle matchs and horrible match ups that prioritize profit instead of the legitimacy of MMa as a sport WILL happen again as soon as possible.

How soon are we talking?
It could possibly happen in the next moment, which would be the soonest, and being you said "as soon as possible"...?
 
LOL. It's Promotion 101.

GSP/Diaz did 1 Million + buys, and Sonnen/Jones did 550,000 buys.

It's all about the fights people want to see. Not one shit is given about legitimacy in the UFC by DFW

/thread

Lol, voicing and repeating for the umpteenth time the obvious implications of what the TS just said doesn't constitute a "/thread".

Besides calling "/thread" on your own post is lame as fuck.
 
this is a balancing act....

to legitimize MMA and the UFC product with the masses they need to sell tickets and put asses in the seats, sometimes sport becomes a casualty to entertainment for this purpose...

Cream always rises to the top and hence the best fighters will always keep winning and getting their show to become the best...

example Benson Henderson is not a marketable draw but has won the last four lightweight title fights against arguably 3 fighters in Edgar, Nate Dia
z and Melendez all of which would probably sell more PPV wise than Hendo

I understand what you are saying, but that doens t make it sound right. There must be meritocracy, it
 
LOL. It's Promotion 101.

GSP/Diaz did 1 Million + buys, and Sonnen/Jones did 550,000 buys.

It's all about the fights people want to see. Not one shit is given about legitimacy in the UFC by DFW

/thread

Thanks for that awesome contribution to this thread, which you obviously didn't read.
 
The Ufc has been doing this forever and it's worked for them.

Btw it's funny to hear people say legitimacy no longer matters when 95/100 title fights are between the top contender and the champ.

It's funny these people have such a huge issue with Dana White hyping fights but are completely over dramatic.
 
How soon are we talking?
It could possibly happen in the next moment, which would be the soonest, and being you said "as soon as possible"...?

As soon as a chance pops up, inspite the fact that will be a hell of a fight but Pettis shouldn t fight with Aldo for the belt, Edgar is another example. So as soon as they can trade off profit for meritocracy i think they will, like i said recent facts support that this a tendency in UFC and i mighty be overreacting but unfornately this a tendency for MMA as well not only UFc.
 
So wait lemme get this straight:

Viewed as pro wrestling is bad for longevity? Last time I checked pro wrestling is alive and well no matter how much I hate it.
 
So wait lemme get this straight:

Viewed as pro wrestling is bad for longevity? Last time I checked pro wrestling is alive and well no matter how much I hate it.

That being said: I fully support the tournament format, but I also applaud the UFC for making every penny it can. Game recognize game. And like my sig says...
 
Anderson Silva vs Stephan Bonnar: not even going to waste my time talking about this.

Emergency fight made on few weeks notice to replace an injured Aldo.

How many other champs would fight a weight class up on a few weeks notice to rescue an event? GSP? Jones?
 
The Ufc has been doing this forever and it's worked for them.

Btw it's funny to hear people say legitimacy no longer matters when 95/100 title fights are between the top contender and the champ.

It's funny these people have such a huge issue with Dana White hyping fights but are completely over dramatic.

All right 95-100, of course you are just putting this numbers by your own mind, but lets assume them are right.
5 matchs are still undeserved and as long there are just one, that should be remembered and at least asked why. MMA is a young sport and has a lot to improve of course, in my opinion making profitable match ups over meritocracy damage the image of MMA as a sport.
 
So wait lemme get this straight:

Viewed as pro wrestling is bad for longevity? Last time I checked pro wrestling is alive and well no matter how much I hate it.

Well the success of pro-wrestling is predicated on its theatrics and larger-than-life narrative.

MMA is a sport whose success is predicated on the pinnacle of human athletics and competition.

See the fault in your analogy? The TS is saying that if the UFC errs towards the former too much the sport aspect of MMA will be lost which really just takes the piss out of the whole thing...
 
No less insidious? Sherdog trying to tell a business that has built itself from a sideshow obscurity into a billion dollar empire how to run itself.
 
Last edited:
All right 95-100, of course you are just putting this numbers by your own mind, but lets assume them are right.
5 matchs are still undeserved and as long there are just one, that should be remembered and at least asked why. MMA is a young sport and has a lot to improve of course, in my opinion making profitable match ups over meritocracy damage the image of MMA as a sport.

Though they are infrequent?
 
Back
Top