The truth about the woody pm.

Originally posted by animal mother
dra, you're telling me that if this is true that doesn't show that the pics were unrequested?

before answering, remember that your credibility is at right around a "USA Fighter" level right now. care to notch it up to "shootoking" territory?

What "credibility" is this AM? You think I care that your little friends believe you over me? Of course they do! They would have if we had taken the time to make a faultless PM. That wasn't kare's intention however.

I'd continue arguing it but I don't see the point. The fact remains that you could have deleted the pm's requesting the pics and simply left a reply by her with a link in your inbox, if she even sent them at all. It's starting to become obvious that you planned on using this account in this manner, and I certainly wouldn't put it past you.

Two questions have yet to be answered:

- how is kare's little ruse worse than AM's constant lies about us since January?

- Where is AM's undeniable proof in this matter? I see alot of people hugging his nuts and scrambling to overshadow that particular point.

Answer those two and we'll move on
 
Originally posted by cybercoma
Even with a different skin, it still doesn't add up.

Woody would have had the NEW belt under his name, which would indicate the screencap was taken AFTER May 22nd. In fact I think the new belts weren't integrated into the boards until the first week of June. Since Woody was banned April 8th, it should've said banned under his name and not had a belt at all.

The scheme at that point is of no consequence.

Not to mention the wrong postcount.
Not to mention the missing signature.
Not to mention their contradicting stories in the eclipse thread.
Not to mention how long it took to post the PM.
Not to mention the time of the PM which would have AM sending it at 7:30am, which although possible, is not likely since we all know AM is a bouncer and doesn't get up in the mornings for a normal day job.

That was the whole point. AM is supposed to be intelligent, why did he not pick up on this sooner? Why did it take you to help him?
 
Originally posted by randomhero20022
this is what DRA had to say about you in the eclipse thread:

As for Don Juan's point, chalk it up to inexperience with Photoshop's "save for web" option and the way it compresses images; or perhaps the supidity of thinking someone would edit the BODY of the PM if they were lying.









pwn3d.

Actually the portion Don Juan called as edited, and his reasonings for it are wrong. Notice how "BODY" is capitalized?
 
Originally posted by banter1279
( I don't even know why the fuck I am getting involved in this but here goes...)

lsg brought up a very interesting point that I would like to discuss. She basically stated that because DRA and kare went so far as to forge a PM, they overstepped the bounds of conventional arguments. kare responded to this by saying that she basically did what animal mother frequently does, but in a visual manner. (for those of you who insist on a link, just go to page 5 and 6 of this thread)

To be honest, I've got to agree with lsg on this one.

Yes, kare, your logic is right in the very broad sense that you were making up information like AM supposedly does, but you did take it to an extra, and unnecessary, level.

For instance: Imagine I called cybercoma a rascist (sorry to pick you out man, but this is just for the sake of an example) Every day I come on these threads and make comments like "cyber hates minorities." One day cyber decides to respond by posting a picture of my family and I at a KKK rally burning a cross.

Now honestly, ask youself this question kare: what do you feel will be viewed as legitimate proof of racism - a random person calling someone a rascist, or a picture detailing rascist activities?

This is what lsg is getting at. You did take this argument to a different level by fabricating that PM because you knew full well that such a fabrication would hold MUCH more ground as evidence then just AM's word.

Because this PM has been found to be false, you are being condemned for overstepping the bounds of regular argument (much like cybercoma would have been if that KKK picture was found to be doctored)

AM did nothing more then clear his name, regardless of how long it took him. Though I wish not to take sides (afterall, who the hell am I?) I must say that as an objective observer (Hell! DRA helped me with an avatar) DRA and kare did take this just a bit too far!

Excuse the spelling errors, It is late and I don't feel like proof-reading this.

You registered in January 2003, were you not here for everything that happened to kare and I? and you're saying this is worse? This is exactly why the whole arguement is ridiculous, kare dishes shit back at AM but we can't do that, AM can't take it. so he calls for us to be banned. pfft
 
Originally posted by RightintheFace
kb, I was in the chatroom. AM posted the link as soon as he got it. Several people were there at once.
My favorite part of your argument here is that you're making fun of AM for spending time figuring you out. Isn't it an equal or greater waste of time to romoshop a picture in an effort to prolong this little war? It's clear your motive, as always, was attention. This time you're absolutely caught in a lie and I've spent the last ten minutes laughing my ass off at your scrambling.
Now, it's clear that punishment on this board is selective. It's a private site, and free speech doesn't enter into any argument on here. Woody was banned for posting a PM. I wasn't even carded for the same offense a couple weeks ago, though I fully expected to be. Surely someone can see to it that these two trolls are permanently banned from the site. I believe the majority has spoken here.

There is no "majority rules" banishment here.

Just because he may have had the link means nothing. Someone else could have sent him a PM with it, and aside from that if he requested pics of kare she may have sent them. So? The argument here is that she does not send pics "unrequested".

She was also given permission by AM to post a PM, and although it was a fake even if they were to take it as real she had permission.

There is no selective banishment here, we haven't done anything punishable. I've been told several times by the admins that neither one of us are a problem. We've received more shit than we could ever dish out, and since no one is carded for "trolling us", if we throw some shit back we won't be either.
 
some gems from the eclipse thread:

Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
There are no naked pics of kare. A few boob shots, and they are always requested

Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
The Woody situation? Why would I argue. You'd deny sending any Pm's, there's no proof either way and it's just a big waste of time.

Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
Your PM's to karebear have obviously been deleted by now


Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
So is your claim that karebear sends out random pm's to users who do not request them?


Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
It wasn't unrequested. Who should I believe? You or the admin she spoke with? hmmmmmm....


Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
You insinuated it was because the pics were unrequested, but they WERE requested dipshit, and I don't think that has any bearing anyway unless you're trolling someone's box with porn

Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
So why is it that your story is pure truth, and mine is completely false when there is no proof of either? karebear's response will most likely be that she doesn't remember. I doubt it was important to her.

Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
You accuse me of lying, I accuse you of lying. karebear won't get in the middle, and I don't blame her the way you've been trolling lately. There is no end to this, so be glad you're out. I'm ridiculously relentless about such things.

Originally posted by karebear
i didn't delete it, well until i took a screen capture of it anyway. once i found out you were woody i decided to hang on to it incase i ever needed it.


Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
No need. Screen capture is more incriminating

What is taking so long is that she is making sure the admins are aware that you are woody, and that they see you gave permission to post the PM. I knew you'd use the "they are editing a PM" excuse! ahahahahahaah


Originally posted by karebear
i don't even know how to go about editing a PM and he's at work

Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
Yes. It makes you wrong AM, it MUST be fake bwaahahahaha


Originally posted by karebear
this isn't court and they have no proof. i on the other hand do. back pedal all ya like.

Originally posted by karebear
we don't talk sherdog off sherdog

Originally posted by karebear
and i have way more proof then you i don't care if you're the king of sherdog or not. you're wrong so live with it.

have a good night. hope it doesn't bother you too much that you were proved wrong. remember it's just the internet.

Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
i was at work at the time the PM was found


Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
As for Don Juan's point, chalk it up to inexperience with Photoshop's "save for web" option and the way it compresses images; or perhaps the supidity of thinking someone would edit the BODY of the PM if they were lying



Originally posted by karebear
i didn't send pics unrequested and HE said the pm was gone because he didn't know about it.
AM you look like an idiot for scrambling like this to prove me wrong. someone a little worried about their E image? get the fuck over it already. so i was right and you were wrong. i'm not gonna actually make you leave like you said.

Originally posted by karebear
3) i'm right. i have the proof. you do not. sorry thank you for playing.
 
Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
Actually the portion Don Juan called as edited, and his reasonings for it are wrong. Notice how "BODY" is capitalized?

Did someone try the trick I did to figure out the pic was fake ? The negative was quite a "truth teller", AM, I took on my time to see it, could you take on yours to answer me, no or yes, thx
 
Originally posted by Le Peste
Did someone try the trick I did to figure out the pic was fake ? The negative was quite a "truth teller", AM, I took on my time to see it, could you take on yours to answer me, no or yes, thx

The portions you said were edited were wrong.
 
Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
The portions you said were edited were wrong.

why are you still arguing the merits of an admitted forgery?
 
Originally posted by animal mother
i know dick about that kind of thing.

I should have posted it but I couldn't host it, it was really a shitty work, I do not congrat Karebear
 
Originally posted by animal mother
why are you still arguing the merits of an admitted forgery?

Because everyone says the body of the PM around the text was edited, and it was not. kare pasted the images in blocks, it's easier that way.
 
Originally posted by Le Peste
I should have posted it but I couldn't host it, it was really a shitty work, I do not congrat Karebear

save the image and post it. Compress it to under 30k and you can use the attachment option on the board. I'd love to see what this "negative" option showed you.
 
Originally posted by DarkRainAngel
Because everyone says the body of the PM around the text was edited, and it was not. kare pasted the images in blocks, it's easier that way.

No, I didn't, you know it, you lie again, I gave a technique to see it was fake without talking about any portion. If you & your wife aren't banned, I think I finally found why the ignore list has been created and I'll invite everyone to put you on their lists, don't feed the trolls. Once again I should have ignored you, I'm guilty on this one.
 
I'm still trying to figure out what this could have possibly showed. The image was not in layrs, it can't be, so any visible edges would have been visible anyway. If the negative option enhanced the compression artifacts that has nothing to do with the editing, the PM had to be compressed to under 30k. Just be cautious Le Peste, that you are not posting something that is simply enhancing compression artifacts. You wouldn't want to make yourself look foolish.
 
Originally posted by Le Peste
No, I didn't, you know it, you lie again, I gave a technique to see it was fake without talking about any portion. If you & your wife aren't banned, I think I finally found why the ignore list has been created and I'll invite everyone to put you on their lists, don't feed the trolls. Once again I should have ignored you, I'm guilty on this one.

Waiting for the pic Le Peste
 
Originally posted by animal mother
woody.jpg


you posted this screenshot of a PM and portrayed it as genuine. you accused me of sending it.

the background on that screenshot is "blues brothers". the new color schemes were not uploaded to Sherdog until
May 22, 2003 . the new belts after that.





woody was banned on April 9, 2003 .

that is a month and a half before the earliest possible date the screenshot could have taken place--but apparently it was saved as soon as karebear found out i was woody.



any pm taken before woody was banned couldn't have the new color scheme and any taken after would have the "banned" text, and not the belt as it appears in the PM. it should look like it does in this woody post. in addition, woody's signature should show up in the PM, as it was inserted upon creation of the account and was never changed.

furthermore, the time stamp on that PM shows woody as having 51 posts on Feb. 18, 2003. a simple search shows that woody got his 51st post on Dec. 2, 2002 and by Feb. 18, 2003 had 64 posts. woody profile

karebear first mentions having the screen cap at 9:24 p.m. not until 9:42 p.m. do we actually see the screen cap. as it has been proven unequovically that this PM is a complete fabrication, it is quite clear that DRA was photoshopping this doctored image in the interim.

as karebear has now been proven to have sent unrequested porn via pm and posted a fake pm and passed it off as real, and DRA was quite clearly complicit in this act, i request that both of them be banned immediately.

pwned
 
Back
Top