1. Mighty Mouse could very well be top3 - he actually is in my book - or even #1.
But for the sake of discussion, it's stil true that USA is the only country where three heavies have a legit case to be considered top3 p4p in the nation.
And yeah, Cormier and Miocic have a case in USA. Mainly because it's undeniable that heavier divisions attract much, much more money than Flyweight - especially in MMA at this stage - and it's called prizefighting for a reason
Mighty Mouse below Cormier and Miocic is a fucking joke, dude. This is coming from someone who constantly bitches about P4P lists being a glorified, imaginary Napoleonic belt to hype smaller men because they need it. It's marketing. Everyone wants to watch the King of the Jungle, no matter who it is or how strong the division, whereas it's very hard to get people excited about the King of the Meerkats.
MM had 11 consecutive title defenses. That's the record. MM's title reign lasted 2142 days. That's second only to Silva, but MM was more active, and he has never tested positive for a banned substance. It's also ahead of GSP-- the GOAT of the fucking sport. Did he even lose a round during that reign before he ran into Cejudo? I can't remember.
Maybe.
How much more dominant does a guy have to be to get P4P respect? What possible argument could forward Stipe's name above his? What, the fact there has never been a truly great HW reign to rival Stipe's relatively modest offering? A reign that includes two wins against a natural LHW named Cormier?
2. Because of that and because he is regarded as the greatest champion in the abolute division in UFC history. He beat basically every great HW of this decade - except Cain who got wasted by injuries - most of them by finish.
C'mon.
He fought a 37-year-old Arlovski. Given, AA was sailing at that moment, but Stipe delivered the first defeat to AA in what became a 5-loss streak, and a 4-9-1 stretch in the twilight of his career.
Mark Hunt is a great fighter, but he was just 10-9 in MMA when Stipe fought him.
Roy Nelson is highly recognizable, we all loved him, but did he ever even break into the Top 5? By ELO ratings his peak ranking during his career was #10.
Ngannou is a monster, but he was green when Miocic shocked the world, and showed what an unintimidated, experienced champion can do. Highly impressive, and one of his strongest wins, but Ngannou turned around and lost to Lewis. He wasn't unbeatable, and he wasn't what he is going to become as a future champion.
Cormier, as great as he is, is a natural LHW. His entire wrestling career he competed between 183-212 pounds. He only left LHW in MMA because he couldn't beat Bones. How much P4P mojo does it really add to Stipe's legacy that he was (barely) able to turn in back-to-back victories against the bridesmaid in the division under him?
Don't get me wrong. Between Overeem, prime JDS, Werdum, a motivated Cormier, and a thunderous phenom like Ngannou, he has accrued the best UFC HW legacy, ever. No doubt. But cleaned out the division he certainly did not. Get real. His first Top 10 win, if it was that, was against Roy in 2013. You're not cleaning out
any division with 11 top wins in 7 years. Not enough frequency. I don't know how to define that, but I think maintaining a stretch of at least 3 years where you accept the highest ranking challenger you haven't beaten while having beaten every single guy in the Top 5 sometime in the past, snapshotted at any point during that stretch, would be a pretty good start. You're literally
waiting on prospects to prove themselves against those vanquished opponents in the Top 5 to give you a new meaningful match. That was GSP for like 5 years.
Right this moment he hasn't faced Blaydes, Lewis, Rozenstruik, Volkov.
Great HWs of the 2010's he didn't beat: Cain, Barnett, Kharitonov, Mir.
High contenders of the 2010's he didn't beat: Bader, Minakov, Rothwell, Kongo, Bigfoot, Browne.
I realize not every guy there is in the UFC, and some were last great before Stipe really entered his prime, let's say around 2013, but I'm putting the brakes on your hyperbole. He sure as shit has not beaten "basically every great HW of the past decade".
3. I think being succesful across diferent weightclass holds especial weight in p4p dicussions.
Everyone listed in the top10 is either the undisputed #1 of all time in his division or a multiple division champ, actually except Holloway.
You can downplay the challenge of a LHW taking on HWs but the fact is Liddell, Tito, Rua or Rampage prefered not to deal with Sylvia's reach or Rizzo/Gonzaga's power. Couture did and succed in championship fights, apart from doing so at LHW too.
Not only is he a two division champ, is also tied for the record for most wins in UFC Heavyweight Championship bouts with Stipe.
Being extraordinarily dominant in one divisions matters a helluva lot more than being ordinarily champion in two.
That's why Aldo and Holloway are undoubtedly going to be remembered as greater FWs than Conor.