Most every shooting BLM cries about has an element that justifies the dead guy getting dead. Show me the video of a LEO getting offed by a citizen doing what they have every right to do. The difference in dynamic is different and you're oversimplifying.
This.
Even the unjust shootings have some element of merit in them-be it a mistake, fear, or overreaction to some stimulus. I can only think of three incidents where it is well known that the police shot someone that posed no threat to them. Castille, the older black gentleman that was shot in I think s Carolina, and the guy in NYC that was reaching for a wallet. I know there are others, but those are the ones that come to mind. Ok one more, Walter Scott shooting was completely wrong, but again, had he cooperated and not fled, he 100% would not have been harmed.
In almost all other instances, the subject was uncooperative, fighting, running, or doing some action that had they not done, they would be alive. Most times, police would rather not fight someone and would rather have them be 100% cooperative. Sometimes, you kind of hope they fight in the instance of wife/child beaters or assholes, but they rarely do.
For example, the guy in Atlanta that fought the officers and stole a taser and was shot before he could shoot the officer with the taser. They riot over that? That officer was fired and charged with murder for fuck’s sake.
Or the kid in Pittsburgh(not far from me) that was recently honored by the nfl-was just involved in a shooting and ran and turned towards the officer as he was running.
I don’t need to say anything about rapist Blake, Littleton who shot at police, the guy in Chicago that shot at police-all caused riots.
The pattern here is that all the subjects are doing something that would make a reasonable officer think “oh shit, I am in danger.” Like i said, even the bad shoots have some level of merit whereas shooting a police officer like we have seen is never justified. Ever.