- Joined
- Sep 27, 2014
- Messages
- 3,655
- Reaction score
- 10
Actually wasn't it Nick that said Nate was at 40%? Would that make him the champ based on his ability to read someone else's percentage?
Not really...all you need is one of these
Actually wasn't it Nick that said Nate was at 40%? Would that make him the champ based on his ability to read someone else's percentage?
Not really...all you need is one of these
"The Brock Lesnar who stepped into the cage with Alistair Overeem, he was at 50, 75 percent. You're going to fight Alistair Overeem at 75 percent, Cain Velasquez at 75 percent. He fought Shane Carwin at 75, or 60, or 80 percent, but even at 95 percent against Shane Carwin, you're at a disadvantage."
For future reference, how a fighter's total ability is divided in an MMA fight
10% luck
20% skill
15% concentrated power of will
5% pleasure
50% pain
100% reason to remember the name
As big a fan as I am of him...
30% McGregor
Patrick Cummins: http://mmajunkie.com/2014/07/ufc-on...s-says-fans-have-seen-50-percent-of-potential
Brock Lesnar: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mma-c...esnar-fought-at-50--in-the-ufc-181907955.html
Quote from article:
http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/blog/ca...esnar-was-only-fighting-at-60-?urn=mma,204371
Came in here to post Master Percentistician Paul Heyman's assessment of Lesnar. An all-time classic.
I'm expecting big thangs from this guy:
http://www.sherdog.com/fighter/Elton-Pure-169589