- Joined
- Jun 24, 2006
- Messages
- 41,901
- Reaction score
- 22,252
No you are using the "no such thing as a lucky punch" crutch to refute people's claims of luck instead of analyzing whether it was lucky or not. There is no such thing as luck only in the sense that there is no such thing as anything that exists solely as an idea. But that is stupid semantics, and we all know what a poster means when they state that they think someone won because they landed a lucky punch. If you don't agree, then the onus is on you to discuss why you think they are wrong.No such thing as a lucky punch. People just like to use "luck" as a crutch when things don't go their way.
But there is a place for intent within the context of fighting. Intent is manifest in every single action.
The term gets thrown around way to frequently for my taste. I wouldn't call even a 1 in 100 shot a lucky punch. Fighters throw probably something like 50+ strikes a fight on average. I guess if your contention is that there is know way to separate a lucky punch from the rest I agree. But I think any reasonable human with a grasp of the English language and sit here and state that Matt Serra was lucky when he rocked GSP. That is something that if they fought another 100 times would probably not happen again. Tyron vs Lawler would happen again though, with a substantial regularity that no one should call that fight lucky.