- Joined
- Jun 5, 2009
- Messages
- 44,864
- Reaction score
- 3,017
is neil for or against the moon landing being real?
LOL, good one, bro.
is neil for or against the moon landing being real?
is neil for or against the moon landing being real?
Incidentally, Oswald shot Kennedy. Whether he was acting on some entity's behalf I don't know, but the shots were easy for him with that rifle (that's why he chose that rifle...he could have had any rifle he wanted)
"It must be true, some guy on a forum said it and he acted like he knew everything."
So we can put the JFK conspiracy to rest because a guy on the internet said that the shots would have been easy for him. Clearly he's transmitted his consciousness back in time and into Oswald's body and has experienced this first hand. Unfortunately, for some reason, Oswald didn't know if he was acting alone so this piece of the puzzle is still a mystery. Can we get an official press release from the government saying "peytonlucy from an MMA forum has officially debunked the JFK conspiracy via time travelling consciousness transmission"?
"But, but the moon landing people are still alive!! Everybody knows that in the REAL conspiracies the government murders everybody who was even partially involved" Seems logical, right?? LOLOLOL Oh you pretentious kids who know everything.......
"It must be true, some guy on a forum said it and he acted like he knew everything."
So we can put the JFK conspiracy to rest because a guy on the internet said that the shots would have been easy for him. Clearly he's transmitted his consciousness back in time and into Oswald's body and has experienced this first hand. Unfortunately, for some reason, Oswald didn't know if he was acting alone so this piece of the puzzle is still a mystery. Can we get an official press release from the government saying "peytonlucy from an MMA forum has officially debunked the JFK conspiracy via time travelling consciousness transmission"?
"But, but the moon landing people are still alive!! Everybody knows that in the REAL conspiracies the government murders everybody who was even partially involved" Seems logical, right?? LOLOLOL Oh you pretentious kids who know everything.......
The participants set up blocks of ballistics gel with a substance similar to human bone inside. These studies showed that it was possible to produce largely undeformed bullets, if they were slowed by a passage through a tissue-like substance before striking bone.
Next, two mannequin figures made of ballistic anatomical substances (animal skin, gelatin, and interior bone-like cast) were set up in the exact relative position of JFK and Connally. A marksman fired the same rifle model found in the Book Depository from a distance equal to that of the sixth floor of the Book Depository building, using a round from the same batch of Western Cartridge Company 6.5x52 mm ammunition purchased with the surplus Carcano weapon in early 1963. The path of their single bullet (followed by high speed photography) duplicated, almost exactly, the wounds suffered by the victims that day, the only difference being that the bullet did not quite have enough energy to penetrate the "thigh" substance in front of the Connally figure, because it struck an extra bone in the "rib" model (i.e., it fractured 2 ribs in the model vs. one rib in Connally). It was also slightly more deformed than CE 399, possibly for the same reason. However, this bullet came close to duplicating all wounds in both men with a single shot, with a bullet having little deformation.[75]
Several shows have looked at it. The waving flag, and shadows, etc. all seem damning but they all are explained and demonstrated.
The fact that people involved in the moon projects are still alive and are credible people makes no difference to the conspiracy believers. I always find this interesting because the same people, when considering ancient events, with seize on the relatively scant historical documentation surrounding ancient events - as if all that they would need is more credible testimony.
I will go so far that something ain't right with some
pictures I've seen of the moonlanding.
Like 2 lightsources instead of 1
No stars, no landingcrater, waving US flag etc
To be fair though, let's say it was hoaxed Abd Mythbusters proved it was all a hoax and a sham, would they really be allowed to show that on tv?
I will go so far that something ain't right with some
pictures I've seen of the moonlanding.
Like 2 lightsources instead of 1
No stars, no landingcrater, waving US flag etc