The Main Event Was A Clear Draw

LockardTheGOAT

Banned
Banned
Joined
Sep 30, 2017
Messages
9,066
Reaction score
3
Round 1: Whittaker 10-9
Round 2: Whittaker 10-9
Round 3: Whittaker 10-9
Round 4: Romero 10-9
Round 5: Romero 10-8

47-47

I know we all have our own judging criteria, but I don't see how you can't make the strongest argument that the above score card isn't the correct one, and thus this fight wasn't a draw? It was.
 
Lol round 1 and 2 should be a 10-7 for bobby , roidero was a mere spectator
 
I had Romero stealing round 3 with the pummeling he gave Whittaker at the end.
 
Romero has been the best MW in the UFC since he KO'd Weidman and Luke. We still don't know how Bobby would fair against them.
 
Round 1: Whittaker 10-9
Round 2: Whittaker 10-9
Round 3: Whittaker 10-9
Round 4: Romero 10-9
Round 5: Romero 10-8

47-47

I know we all have our own judging criteria, but I don't see how you can't make the strongest argument that the above score card isn't the correct one, and thus this fight wasn't a draw? It was.

Looked like a pretty clear win for Whittaker to me. Most of the judges thought so as well.
 
Lol round 1 and 2 should be a 10-7 for bobby , roidero was a mere spectator

68747470733a2f2f73332e616d617a6f6e6177732e636f6d2f776174747061642d6d656469612d736572766963652f53746f7279496d6167652f6d50754b474f5a5f4865575435673d3d2d3536333838363633382e313532373536323066623961386166613336373432363432383131342e676966


When the fuck was the last time a round was scored 10 - 7?
 
Whittaker round 3? May as well give Romero round 1 and 2 then and I've seen everything ...
 
yeah judging is flawed, a guy can win 3 rounds vs someone but he got rocked more in the 2 rounds he lost and can win the fight. happens a lot, the rounds are not weighted correctly

in the stupid system that we have though most ppl will say robert won and im okay with that, its just a really really really stupid judging system that we inherited from boxing that doesnt fit this sport
 
Romero won 3 and 5, I can see the argument for 5 being 10-8 but I thought 10-9. Romero did not win round 4, although Romero did more damage, Whittaker heavily out landed him. Also I thought round 1 wasn't that far off from a 10-8 for Whittaker simply because Romero decided to just watch Whittaker jab him for nearly the entire round. Romero didn't deserve the win, he needed to finish but he couldn't quite get it.
 
Whittaker won more rounds. Romero came much closer to stopping the fight. When Whittaker was turtling face down on the mat, the fight could have easily been stopped.
 
Romero has been the best MW in the UFC since he KO'd Weidman and Luke. We still don't know how Bobby would fair against them.
What about the first whittaker romero fight or do we ignore that?
 
I scored it a draw. Romero just cant beat whittaker
 
For real now, round 1 should had been 10-8 for bobby, Romero did not win round 4 ofc, and round 5 wasnt 10-8 for Romero cause he could had finishing the fight, but he stall, he did nothing with the advantage he had, so a clearly 10-9 ! Bobby 3 rounds, roidero 2 rounds, he cant go to a title fight and NOT FIGHT for 2 straight rounds. Clear as water !
 
Romero won 3, 4 and 5. 3 was close and could have gone either way. A draw was the best outcome, I actually had Yoel winning.
 
Round 1: Whittaker 10-9
Round 2: Whittaker 10-9
Round 3: Whittaker 10-9
Round 4: Romero 10-9
Round 5: Romero 10-8

47-47

I know we all have our own judging criteria, but I don't see how you can't make the strongest argument that the above score card isn't the correct one, and thus this fight wasn't a draw? It was.
Wasteland
 
Every judge gave Romero round 3.
Every Sherdog writer gave Romero round 3.

MMAjunkie gave Romero round 3.
MMAfighting gave Romero round 3.

I gave Romero round 3.
 
What about the first whittaker romero fight or do we ignore that?
Bobby point fought and fought to survive in that one. Was hoping he'd be more aggresive last night but he wasn't and got dropped several times.
 
Back
Top