KnockHimOut
Orange Belt
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2012
- Messages
- 434
- Reaction score
- 0
I decided to come up with of list of common train of thoughts that I have seen on many threads and some really me laugh with the logic behind it such as:
Fighter A beat Fighter B. Fighter B beat Fighter C, therefore Fighter A will beat fighter C. MMAth.
Having a wrestling background=cardio for days
Fighter A knocks out Fighter B. Now Fighter B who has never been KO'ed has a glass chin and has been exposed.
Fighter A wins a close decision over Fighter B but the decision could of gone either way. So that means Fighter A robbed Fighter B or the judges are blind.
A champion of a certain division does not feel like either moving up or down a weight class means that champion is ducking another champion.
Short winning streak=Goat in the making and you heard it here first.
I probably left many out but please feel free to add on to the many outlandish things sherdoggers say.
Fighter A beat Fighter B. Fighter B beat Fighter C, therefore Fighter A will beat fighter C. MMAth.
Having a wrestling background=cardio for days
Fighter A knocks out Fighter B. Now Fighter B who has never been KO'ed has a glass chin and has been exposed.
Fighter A wins a close decision over Fighter B but the decision could of gone either way. So that means Fighter A robbed Fighter B or the judges are blind.
A champion of a certain division does not feel like either moving up or down a weight class means that champion is ducking another champion.
Short winning streak=Goat in the making and you heard it here first.
I probably left many out but please feel free to add on to the many outlandish things sherdoggers say.