- Joined
- Jun 9, 2010
- Messages
- 9,662
- Reaction score
- 0
He's wrong about Werdum and you're wrong about Hendo.
Yay! So much accomplished by your novel-lengthed posts.
Hunt and AA lost to a smaller Fedor. Write a book about those now.
I'm not wrong.
I would be, if weight was the only criteria, but since I expect sherdoggers to be smarter than that, I can't let it fly.
You can't say that Werdum, who had a significant heigh advantage, reach advantage, slight weight advantage and lower fat % wasn't a significantly bigger man.
Meanwhile Fedor and Hendo have almost identical frame and Fedor was a bit heavier but also fatter.
There is no size argument necessery here.
Just look at the photos FFS.
If Fedor was the 237 pound beast that he was in his prime, then I wouldn't say that the size difference was significant, but in this case it was. Not that it mattered.
I was just pointing out the fact that 2 out of 3 Fedor's losses were against significantly bigger guys and one was against a guy basically his size.
And I said that because he keeps on bringing upo the lie that Fedor got KOed by a MW.
TRT Hendo was a HW and he wasn't really smaller. Especially since Fedor didn't even try to grapple.
I would say that Fedor was significantly bigger than Hendo, if they had the same amount of body fat at those weights.
Here is a perfect example of what I'm talking about:
Both Fedor and Coleman weighed 224 pounds here, but look at their phisiques. Fedor has pretty low fat % for Fedor, but Coleman is ripped. Making him the bigger man. Not significantly, but he is bigger.
Last edited: