I read an article by an old boxer (think it was Jack Dempsey?) which basically proposed that the Jolt is a much better set up punch than the jab.
For those who don't know, the Jolt is basically having your knuckles connecting to the opponent vertically, much like the hook, rather than horizontally. This boxer claimed that throwing a punch in that manner will telegraph it less. It will also give you more power, as movement of the fist from the guard is just a straight line. So presumably, there is no loss of energy as there is in the twisting motion of the jab.
What do you guys think of this? It does kind seem to make sense, at least about the telegraphing part. What would be the drawback of the Jolt? And if it so advantageous, how come more fighters are not using it?
For those who don't know, the Jolt is basically having your knuckles connecting to the opponent vertically, much like the hook, rather than horizontally. This boxer claimed that throwing a punch in that manner will telegraph it less. It will also give you more power, as movement of the fist from the guard is just a straight line. So presumably, there is no loss of energy as there is in the twisting motion of the jab.
What do you guys think of this? It does kind seem to make sense, at least about the telegraphing part. What would be the drawback of the Jolt? And if it so advantageous, how come more fighters are not using it?