I've been trying to think, is there another "champ" who had to relinquish the title because he simply would not defend it?I agree..
the whole point of those Interims has to do with Conor.
He runs so much from title defenses, you need to create an Interim who will take over once Conor relinquishes his belts (due to forfeit).
But a healthy champ accepting three fights in another weight class while avoiding defenses is unique, I think, to Conor.The irony of the situation seems to have little to do with McGregor. Just over a year ago the guy won the featherweight belt and just over a month ago he won the lightweight belt. Heaven forbid anyone wait a month or more to defend a belt. And a year plus before defending isn't unheard of.
Only if you count injuries.I've been trying to think, is there another "champ" who had to relinquish the title because he simply would not defend it?
Almost sure there are other examples but can't recall em.
not accepting fights.But a healthy champ accepting three fights in another weight class while avoiding defenses is unique, I think, to Conor.
Manufactured two belt "champ" who immediately had one stripped, LOL.
But I shouldn't laugh because it's pretty disheartening what this fuckery is doing to the sport I love.
Overeem didnt defend his strikeforce title for 2 years and they still didnt strip him.Only if you count injuries.
but while healthy?
I can't think of anyone!
This is UFC discussionOvereem didnt defend his strikeforce title for 2 years and they still didnt strip him.
That's because Cucker let the inmates run the asylum.Overeem didnt defend his strikeforce title for 2 years and they still didnt strip him.
Nope, he won that fair and square.Aint nothing manufactured about this: