The Golden Age of MMA (2000-2010), the Present, and the Future

Oh he had talent, no doubt.

But without the trash talk, he's Jon Fitch.

Right, hence my comment about him being not THAT great. I never said he was terrible or bad. The trash talking definitely elevated his popularity though.(as it seems to do with other fighters who are good/not great)
 
I do miss the shomanship of Japan
 
Right, hence my comment about him being not THAT great. I never said he was terrible or bad.

It's crazy to think Chael was within a few seconds, 2 separate times, of beating a GOAT in Anderson and winning the MW belt.....AND beating another GOAT in Jon Jones and winning the LHW belt. (he wouldn't have really "beat" jones, but jones wouldn't have been able to continue with that toe hanging off)

(oh and he would've been stripped of the MW belt if he'd won, due to steroids. But still...it's crazy to think how insanely close he was to dethroning 2 goats )




The trash talking definitely elevated his popularity though.(as it seems to do with other fighters who are good/not great)

ConnorMcGregor.gif

lol I'm kidding, I love Connor's style. He could not say anything and be Fedor-like, and I would still dig his style. BUT...I'm not sure he's gonna be able to handle full camp wrestlers. Or Aldo. But I hope he can.
 
But I am sure you know better than the guys that actually brought it into the mainstream...

Yeah but those guys have gone off the rails now. If you don't think mma was a lot more interesting 10 years ago, then you weren't watching mma 10 years ago. Imo.
 
I echo your sentiments TS...

I have been saying the same kinds of things for some time now, as the Zuffa strategy has been obvious for a while, and the writing has been on the wall for quite a few years now.

I hope everyone who hated any org bar the UFC, wishing for their demise and pined for UFC monopoly just so 'all the best fighters could fight each other' (narrow-mindedly thinking that it was the only scenario in which it could be achieved) are happy with what they've got.

I'm going to say I certainly don't hate the way it is now, I still enjoy watching MMA, but there are many aspects of 'the way it was' we'll never get back again, and that's a loss.
 
I strongly disagree on that. Chuck was a gigantic star during his reign. Hell my grandmother knew who Chuck Liddell was.





Haha thanks for reading it bro! Turned out way longer than I meant.

Good point about them being the NBA, NFL, etc. combined. I'd say that's pretty damn accurate. The only way I see them being overtaken is for a giant coalition of a lot of promoters to combine, form Voltron, and defeat them.

But they might not need to be overtaken. They hopefully can course-correct, but it'll be years if that happens. After the FOX deal expires (I bet money FOX won't renew that contract...at least not at the original price). The FOX deal is when it really started going downhill fast. That's when they started flooding the market with shit fights. But they are kind of stuck having to do that until that deal changes or outright ends.

Zuffa could also conceivably sell the UFC. And tbh, some of their recent behavior has made me wonder if they aren't getting ready to do that.

Dude just stop! RRR is so fucking popular right now it is unbelievable. She is arguably the biggest MMA star ever and I am not saying this because I think she is the best but because of her popularity and fame. You are clueless if you think Chuck fucking Liddell was more popular than RRR.
 
The foreseeable future of the UFC/Unified Rules MMA is bleak in North America. The UFC is stripping itself of all it's flavor and individuality. They seem to have adopted a military mindset: Make everybody the same. That's a mistake.

What made mma so great in the golden age was that fighters were like video game characters. Everybody had a unique look, unique back story, unique personalities, and unique fighting styles. Now? Most UFC guys fight the same way (which is a product of both the evolution of the sport, plus the fighters adapting to exploit the damn Unified Rules and the cage), most fighters look similar (lots and lots of tats, shaved heads), and with this Reebok deal, gone are the days of fighters having their own shorts that are part of their image:


images


images




^ you know exactly who wore those. Most of us do. Making everybody wear basically the same shit is like telling Rocky he can't wear his American flag shorts. It's just wrong.








Zuffa seems to think that people watch fights, just to watch fights. Seeing a mixed martial arts fight on tv back in 2005, WAS the shit! Most of us didn't care who was fighting. We just wanted to see some martial arts fights. Times have changed, boys. Now there are fights on every other day, between "fighter A!" and "fighter B!" and nobody cares anymore.

Dana, Lorenzo...listen good. I'm about to tell you what movie/tv show producers have known for decades. CHARACTERS are what keep people invested!!!!

You ever watch LOST? Ok, weird shit happens on an island. Cool. But you cannot sustain fan interest in that alone, if you have a metric fuck-ton of characters that we don't know well, we don't give a shit about, and very shortly they are killed off. You would say "well what was the point in THAT?" The LOST crew knew this, so immediately they made sure fans got to know Jack, Locke, Hurley,etc. You get to know their back stories. You get to know their personalities, their strengths, their weaknesses, their motivations. You begin to care what happens to them. You become invested.

That applies to any show/movie/entertainment product. It's really fucking simple, you goofs! :D Pride knew this, which is why most of us can still name half the Pride roster off the top of our heads, even the obscure guys. And Zuffa USED to know this. But they've gotten away from it.



59ffe56f67f37b2acac05a4dffa93ed1972e13326d5518cd272261441dac9f30_facebook




And before you start in on me about recent ppv numbers being "the best ever!" hang on a sec. Yeah I know the recent ppv numbers, but those figures can be manipulated. A company can buy ppv's on it's own to falsely inflate the sense of value of a product. They can also quietly purchase seats in the arena, to inflate the gate figures. Why would they do that? To raise the market/sale value of a product. ARE they doing that? Don't know, but I have a hunch.

The REAL gauge of fan interest is to ask ANYBODY you know in real life if they know who Connor Mcgregor is, or if they still follow the UFC at all. Most people you know will NOT...I would put money on that. Another indicator: if you were on this forum around 2005-2010 you will notice the number of members here...the hardcore die-hard mma fans....has dropped considerably. The reality is, interest in mma is down, people. I believe we are in a new Dark Age. And that's odd, considering mma is shown now more than ever before. Yet most people you will come across in daily life simply don't give a shit about mma anymore, or have any idea who the fighters are.
















But there is hope on the horizon.





Play this song as you read this next part of the post

[YT]1BeRpAORAps[/YT]




I've always held the opinion that the 2000-2010 era of mma was the golden age, the high water mark, and that mma will NEVER be like that again. I always figured with the Unified Rules, the things that made Pride so different from western mma....the one-night tournaments, open weight tournaments, soccer kicks/stomps, freak show fights, crossover fights, the lax drug testing, etc....went the way of the dinosaur and could never legally happen again. Not with the sanctioning of mma.




To me, what made the "golden age" of mma so golden, was having 2 completely different flavors of mma to satisfy us. The UFC is chocolate ice cream. I love chocolate ice cream. We all do. But dammit man I don't want to eat chocolate ice cream every week. Sometimes I want some vanilla. Pride is vanilla ice cream. It's delicious. It's refreshing. I like to switch it up every few weeks. And mixing chocolate and vanilla together? That's the best.








Scott Coker taking the reigns at Bellator got me excited about mma's future for the first time in years. But Bellator is still under the unified rules and even if they rise to say, Strikeforce level, and can marginally compete with the UFC, that would be terrific but it still will NOT be anything even remotely close to what the epic UFC vs PRIDE wars were back in the mid-2000's.

Awhile back I read that Sakakibara is getting back into the mma game also, and was planning a show for new years this year. No clue what the latest news is on that, or if it's happening at all, but that also gave me a twinge of excitement about the future of mma. Sakakibara and Coker have worked together before, are friends, and would absolutely co-promote and both have stated they are more than willing to do crossover fights between their 2 promotions. THAT is the only thing that is going to be able to dethrone the UFC....a coalition between Sakakibara, Coker and anyone else they would be willing to work with.

So why can't Sakakibara, or anyone else, create another PRIDE in Japan, in this day and age? It wouldn't be Pride, it would be something new. But why couldn't they follow the Pride blueprint? -minus the yakuza element of course.

Japanese orgs won't have to follow the Unified Rules, so couldn't they use the exact same rules Pride used? And the epic Pride presentation. Why couldn't they hire the exact same people/firms that handled those things for Pride? Get some tyko drummers, giant screens, blue lights, screaming Pride lady (I miss her), get back quadros/bas/mauro/once in awhile throw in Frank Shamrock, Pat Miletich, Randy Couture, etc. to commentate.

stephen_quadros3.jpg










So what's preventing this from happening in the future? What are the hurdles?



- 1. I figure Japanese interest in mma has dwindled, much like western interest in mma is dwindling So the promoter would have to find a way to rekindle the interest, at least somewhat.

- 2. Japanese steer clear of anything have the stink of yakuza scandal attached to it. That image could be shed over time with strong and clever marketing strategies, I'm guessing.

- 3. No tv deal in Japan. Well surely there is a way to get another tv deal over there. And if not, why not explore other mediums? ppv, internet, get movie theaters to show fights, something!

- 4. Financing. I know very little about how that works. But I know smart businessmen can find ways to get backing. It might take several years, but I imagine it's doable.

Way too fucking long.

lxy3e7V.gif
 
I echo your sentiments TS...

I have been saying the same kinds of things for some time now, as the Zuffa strategy has been obvious for a while, and the writing has been on the wall for quite a few years now.

I hope everyone who hated any org bar the UFC, wishing for their demise and pined for UFC monopoly just so 'all the best fighters could fight each other' (narrow-mindedly thinking that it was the only scenario in which it could be achieved) are happy with what they've got.

I'm going to say I certainly don't hate the way it is now, I still enjoy watching MMA, but there are many aspects of 'the way it was' we'll never get back again, and that's a loss.

Yep. I agree completely. I was one of those guys who wanted one org to win the wars, so we could see the best fight the best. BUT, looking back, I miss the competition. And the funny thing is, we COULD have seen crossover fights anyway, had any other org other than UFC prevailed. And we'd still have healthy competition between other orgs. I just miss the way it was, I guess. idk.


Dude just stop! RRR is so fucking popular right now it is unbelievable. She is arguably the biggest MMA star ever and I am not saying this because I think she is the best but because of her popularity and fame. You are clueless if you think Chuck fucking Liddell was more popular than RRR.

What are you basing that on, exactly?
 
Yep. I agree completely. I was one of those guys who wanted one org to win the wars, so we could see the best fight the best. BUT, looking back, I miss the competition. And the funny thing is, we COULD have seen crossover fights anyway, had any other org other than UFC prevailed. And we'd still have healthy competition between other orgs. I just miss the way it was, I guess. idk.




What are you basing that on, exactly?

Just for starters, Twitter def shows how popular a person is by how many follow them (because they are interested in them), correct? RRR 1.6 million followers and Chuck with 531k. RRR is all over sportscenter, do not see Chuck anywhere. The only time I see Chuck on national TV anymore is if they are showing old knockouts or some shit. Chuck had his heyday when MMA was somewhat popular but RRR is an icon right now at the peak of MMA. RRR is also in a lot of movies including expendables 3, entourage, and fast and furious 7. They are really not even a comparison.
 
Just for starters, Twitter def shows how popular a person is by how many follow them (because they are interested in them), correct? RRR 1.6 million followers and Chuck with 531k. RRR is all over sportscenter, do not see Chuck anywhere. The only time I see Chuck on national TV anymore is if they are showing old knockouts or some shit. Chuck had his heyday when MMA was somewhat popular but RRR is an icon right now at the peak of MMA. RRR is also in a lot of movies including expendables 3, entourage, and fast and furious 7. They are really not even a comparison.

Dude, I didn't mean who is more popular right now. Thought it was clear i meant Chuck at his peak, vs Ronda right now.

So you're basing it on fucking twitter followers? Bro, when Chuck was doing his thing, I'm pretty sure there wasn't a twitter. Ronda is on sportscenter a lot? Well so was Chuck at his peak, a LOT. She's an icon? Chuck was the FIRST crossover mma superstar.

I can't tell if you're just trolling, or really believe what you're saying. If you believe what you're saying, you weren't watching during Chuck's fame peak (2005-2008'ish).




The real litmus test is to go around and ask everybody you come across if they know who ronda rousey is. Then ask them if they know who Chuck Liddell is. See for yourself who is more known. Seriously, try that. Let us know what you find out.
 
Tried the litmus test and turns out Ronda is way, way more popular than Chuck ever was by a 5-1 margin one day and an infinity to 1 margin( no one I asked heard of Chuck that day)
 
But I am sure you know better than the guys that actually brought it into the mainstream...

Let's just put an end to this BS right here.

Dana had nothing to do with MMAs popularity or resurgence.

As a matter of fact,.. when MMA started getting popular again, the UFC was second fiddle to Pride,.. yet he gets all the credit,.. its absurd.

Its as simple as he just happen to be there when the people WATCHING rebuilt the sport, because of the excitment built around fighters like Fedor and Wanderlei.

As a matter of fact,.. when the first TUF aired, most of us thought it was garbage and a joke. The only thing good about it, was the final fight,.. but we all knew that both of them would get schooled by Pride fighters.

This whole notion where Dana tries to take credit for the rise of mma is absurd.
 
"most fighters look similar (lots and lots of tats, shaved heads)"

Most of the champs are some of the least tattooed people in MMA....except for McGOAT of course.
 
"most fighters look similar (lots and lots of tats, shaved heads)"

Most of the champs are some of the least tattooed people in MMA....except for McGOAT of course.

You could say mc goat isn't a real champ .
 
Back
Top