Troll account?
Fact is that those are the toughest guys in the division, you can go on all you want about how they didn't do well after facing Jones, but who didn't they do well against?
Bader and Glover both beat Rampage, so now he "looks bad" , but how does that affect Jones in any way when he already destroyed both Bader and Glover?
And Rashad has had some off nights, but in a career as long as his is, that's only natural, and he still had time to outwrestle Phil Davis, submit Chael Sonnen who, using fantastic technique, finished shogun, and then Jon outmaneuvered Belfort, who has been destroying some of the greatest prospects in MMA and a legend in Henderson.
To me it seems like when these guys lose you go "Oh I guess that means he had that weakness all along and really wasn't that good" while when they win you go "yeah but look, the guy they just won against just lost, so how good can that guy really be?"
If you give great weight to every loss and discredit every single win, then EVERYONE is LOOKING BAD. when that is clearly not the case.
After Jones loses to DC (if that were to happen) you're gonna be in this thread going, SEEEE I told ya'll!! .. Please tell me your understand how fucking retarded that is?
They can't all be constantly unstoppable, sometime's they'll look bad, but if you assume they look bad because they've secretly always been terrible and not because they're facing someone genuinely better, then guess what. Everyone will eventually suck and you'll be missing out on what it means to truly believe in a fighter with all its ups and downs.
