- Joined
- Jun 28, 2009
- Messages
- 14,025
- Reaction score
- 4,196
India is going up isn't it?To not understand the projection of birthrates in the future may be just as ignorant.
India is going up isn't it?To not understand the projection of birthrates in the future may be just as ignorant.
Also to the Christians, I was told all you have to do to be Christian is accept Christ as your lord and savior?
Is that not true?
Marxist Communism has never been implemented.
India is going up isn't it?
ValidArmani's original post equated atheism/communism/abortions together. The data in the US does not support this theory. Christians get the most abortions in fact.
Wow. I thought they were on the up.Look at my post a few posts back of here. I tried to summarize it but India pretty much is where other developed countries are now with having about 2 kids per family. It is interesting because most peopel (including myself until recently) assumed they still had a very high birthrate today. They don't. Their population likely will stay steady like the US, Germany, etc and could possibly even decline depending on how they handle their borders and immigration.
Wow. I thought they were on the up.
But even if it flatlines for the time being. So many people born into poverty means they still need to control it. Although they never will. Places like India will see huge death rates when water shortages and food shortages become more frequent in the future.
Unless the resource controllers resign their power to the Proletariats that isn't communism. Marxist Communism shares resources AND power equally. The 2nd part has never been explored.That What in the Flying FUCK was that nightmare state known as the USSR? They sure as hell claimed to be Marxist communists.. So what is the difference between Marxist communism and Soviet/USSR Communism? Whats the difference between Marxist communism and Chinese and North Korean communism?
No. You have a fundamental misunderstanding of this fallacy.You replied with the No True Scotsman to a post where someone made the claim that Christians who engage in abortion are not practicing Christians.
Clearly this fallacy is out of place in this context because the tenets do not hinge on people's actions. You'd do better to accuse Christians of hypocrisy than to cite the aforementioned fallacy, in which case I wouldn't have taken issue with your post.
No. You have a fundamental misunderstanding of this fallacy.
If people self identify as Christians and get abortions they are indeed Christians. No tenants regarding abortion in the Christian faith exist.
I did too and surveys have shown most people think its going up too. Our minds are still stuck in the 50s-60s where it was skyrocketing. That's the point I was making in the earlier post though. India already has flat lined. You may see India line is still going up and think that can't be. Watch this video at beginning at 23:30. It explains it better than I can in a visual (actually watch the whole video if you have time, its really awesome imo)
The point being made is poor countries have more children because of child mortality. As they become developed, families (on their own) have less children. This happens across the board with developed countries. The US and Germany actually have to rely on immigration in order to maintain their population size at his point. Population control really isn't necessary.
I identify as an airplane, so it must be so. No True Scotsman if you disagree.
Checkmate.
^Again, misunderstanding of the fallacy.
When someone discounts membership in a group because of behavior they judge in conflict THAT'S No True Scotsman, which is exactly what happened. Instead of saying, yeah Christians struggle with this issue also, he simply removed that discourse by asserting that a christian woman who gets an abortion is an impossibility.
Hans Rosling is amazing at educating people in these matters. I'd wager that most people don't even know that the child births in the world has actually stopped increasing and the only population increase we have globally is due to people in poorer countries getting better living standards and therefor living longer.
You're misunderstanding the fallacy. What you have here is a Russian, born in Russia, claiming to be a Scotsman, and you're arguing that he is absolutely a Scotsman because he claims it.
You've taken the fallacy and made it impossible to not be what you claim.
I'm an airplane. Prove me wrong.
China now has too many men because of those policies. Russia has too many women, the men drink themselves to an early grave.
Reckon Chinese-Russian mix would make attractive babies?