First,
I really mostly agreed with the no rematch bit and that immediate rematches should be held for controversy and champions as them being champions deserve their shot back, but even then 1 fight for them to prove they deserve it makes the most sense in my mind. For a challenger that loses after winning most the fight...you lost you have to start over, but still 2 fights and you are probably back there.
As for the damage, I didn't really see any effect on Silva, he got caught flatfooted once and slipped and then slipped when moving backwards it happens, I've been in rings with wrestling shoes and slipped on my ass while getting ready to ref before. The look on Anderson's face was if anything annoyance when taking the biggest shots from sonnen..to the point he dropped his hands and got tagged 3 times, and honestly I expected him to laugh. The GnP didn't seem to have anything, and I didn't see the breakdown of strikes to the head and body, but it seemed like a majority of the shots were "busy work" to silva's body.
I actually thought when Sonnen said what he did about Anderson's BB that Anderson might pull guard on him, and kept thinking that Anderson is just waiting for Chael to lose on the ground. Not what I want to see from the "P4P Champ" but I don't know how I would take someone insulting me how Sonnen did Silva. The thing I take exception with is the next part.
One more idea here;
Its racism, American culture put more weight on striking and dont respect the "submission" or the time to set it up for a win. "What the hell, those Brazilians introducing this shit into the fight game? Its manly to punch".
KOs are easy in that it dosnt hurt, you just go to sleep. But a good heel hook, your gonna feel that for more than days.
nationalism maybe, Racism no. Brazilians are not a race, if you want to argue that people think that Brazilians are all black/of African descent then maybe I'll listen to it, but I'd still go with nationalistic preference over implicit/explicit racism. The fact is also that people know wrestling here and more laymen on mma that I've chatted with think ppl just wrestle when on the ground, but that may be me living in the midwest too. Wrestling and top = control to most fans and even most judges it seems.
Wrestling is by far a white dominated sport and maybe its just the midwest but its a working class to middle class sport as well. Striking sports on the other hand are not white dominated sports, and are over represented by minorities in this country. (go to an amateur boxing tournament for evidence.)
I think the "striking" bias is just because that is what we are used to and that produces more "exciting" moments to fans especially when you see the effect it has on a person, a choke usually someone wakes up within five seconds is on their feet in ten. Just my thoughts tho, I understand race still being a big issue in America (gender also). But in this case I don't feel it applies.