The Biggest Robbery in UFC history, According to Media vs Judges scores...

Strikes and damage don’t matter. GSP controlled the octagon.

50-45 GSP.
 
TheToqueville said:
There hasn't been a single fight in the history of the UFC where the disparity between judges scores and media scores was greater.....

22 media outlets scored it for Hendricks

3 for GSP...... LOL



48-47 Hendricks: 19
49-47 Hendricks: 1
49-46 Hendricks: 2
48-47 GSP: 3



MMA frenzy:48-47 Hendricks
http://mmafrenzy.com/96243/ufc-167-play-by-play/

Sherdog: 48-47 Hendricks (all 3 pbp)
http://www.sherdog.com/news/news/UFC-167-Results-St-Pierre-vs-Hendricks-PlaybyPlay-Updates-59307

MMA Junkie: Hendricks, 48-47
http://mmajunkie.com/2013/11/16/ufc-167-play-by-play-and-live-results-630-p-m-et/

Bleacher Report: 48-47 Hendricks
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...esults-play-by-play-and-fight-card-highlights

CBS Sports: 48-47 Hendricks
http://www.cbssports.com/general/writer/gregg-doyel/24238456/ufc-167-live-blog-and-results

MMA Fighting: 48-47 Hendricks
http://www.mmafighting.com/2013/11/...orges-st-pierre-vs-johny-hendricks/in/4876945

Bloody Knuckle: 48-47 Hendricks
http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2013/11/...icks-live-results-play-by-play-ppv/in/4875703

MMA Weekly: 48-47 Hendricks
http://www.mmaweekly.com/ufc-167-play-by-play-georges-st-pierre-vs-johny-hendricks

MMA Rising: 48-47 Hendricks
http://www.mmarising.com/articles/2...ierre-vs-hendricks-live-play-by-play-results/

Fighters.com: 49-46 Hendricks
http://www.fighters.com/11/16/ufc-1...s-and-play-by-play-watch-prelims-here-630-est

5thRound: 49-46 Hendricks
http://www.5thround.com/159023/ufc-167-st-pierre-vs-hendricks-live-results-and-play-by-play/

Fox Sports: 48-47 Hendricks
http://msn.foxsports.com/ufc/story/st-pierre-hendricks-167-live-fight-blog-111613

Cage Potato: 48-47 Hendricks
http://www.cagepotato.com/ufc-167-st-pierre-vs-hendricks-main-card-results-commentary/

Pro MMA Now: 48-47 Hendricks
http://prommanow.com/2013/11/16/ufc-167-live-results-and-play-by-play/

Inside Fights: 48-47 GSP (scored rounds 3,4,5 for gsp) (lol 4)
http://insidefights.com/2013/11/16/ufc-167-main-card-live-results-play-by-play-discussion/

MMA Kanvas: 48-47 Hendricks
http://mmakanvas.ninemsn.com.au/articles/news/1030/ufc-167-gsp-vs-hendricks-live-result-and-bog.html

MMA Adam Matin: 48-47 Johny Hendricks


Fight Metric: 48-47 Hendricks
http://blog.fightmetric.com/2013/11/st-pierre-vs-hendricks-official-ufc.html

BjPenn.com: 48-47 Hendricks
https://twitter.com/chaseraymond

MMA Report: 48-47 Hendricks


Fight Network: 48-47 Hendricks


Josh Gross (ESPN): 48-47 GSP, then updated to 48-47 Hendricks
https://twitter.com/JoshGrossESPN

SportsIllustrated.com Jeff Wagenheim : 48-47 GSP
https://twitter.com/jeffwagenheim

Loretta Hunt - 49-47 Hendricks
https://twitter.com/lorettahuntmma

Dave Meltzer - 48-47 GSP
http://www.f4wonline.com/more/more-...om-las-vegas-gsp-vs-hendricks-sonnen-vs-evans






Literally the biggest robbery ever in the history of the UFC when you take into account, the judges vs media scores.


Now keep in mind that the same people complaining about Jone vs Reyes, had no problem with GSP being scored as the winner by judges.....

This shows you that for the haters, this has nothing to do with judging, just blind hate, and desperate attempts to latch on to whatever excuse they can to marginalize what Jones has achieved.
View attachment 726537 View attachment 726849
Click to expand...

We don't want to rehash this shit. Hendricks doesn't even care anymore.
 
Oh now media scores matter? @TheToqueville
nate-diaz-209-1479382722-800.jpg
 
I agree GSP vs Hendricks was a robbery. But there have been worse ones.

Barzola vs Bochniak was ridiculous. Diego vs. Pearson was absolutely idiotic. And for the life of me I can't understand Machida vs. Shogun I.
 
Abazzdeboom said:
GSP got the decision because Johnny didnt fight in the 5th and GSP was going forward.
Just like Jones got it because he was more agressive than Reyes in the 5th.

But in recent memory, scoring Stamann Vs Song a draw was a fucking joke and a nasty robbery too. Stamann won without a doubt.
But since they are no name, nobody gives a fuck. That shit happens almost every card
Click to expand...
This! Hendricks coasted in rd. 5 and as a challenger he had a responsibility to finish strong. Nobody wants a champ that coasts in rd. 5.
 
People forgetting
Randleman/Rutten
bisping/hamill
KZ/Garcia
Pham/Garcia
Sanchez/Kampmann
Sanchez/Gomi
 
People forget how much gsp was hated for being the most dominant champ, not having the most fan friendly style, and being Canadian. Media bias in full effect there. Also Hendrix coaches telling him he had already won between the 4th and 5th is what lost him the fight.
 
Cathal Pendred vs Sean Spencher. Literally every single media outlet scored it 30-27 or 29-28 spencer, judges scored it 30-27 X2 and 29-28 for Pendred by Unanimous decision.
 
Anyone with a brain could see the logic in both fight decisions. Neither was a robbery.

GSP outpointed Hendricks for 2 rounds and Hendricks did a lot more in his 2 rounds, but not enough for a 10-8. First round was totally even, the judges gave it to the champ.

Jones vs Reyes, I had Reyes winning the first 3 rounds, but I was happy that Jones took the win because Reyes was done in the 4th and 5th and he was even more done if there was a 6th and 7th. If I was a judge I'd have given it to Reyes, but a part of me was happy he didn't get that because the better fighter won. Reyes started off strong but faded big time and Jones was tightening the noose.


Bottom line, the scoring system is shit and we need an MMA friendly scoring system. This boxing crap is archaic for this sport.
 
grimballer said:
Well there’s a reason why gsp retired after that fight (in his prime)

he knew he was gifted a decision n in a immediate rematch he had nothing for Hendricks

usatsi_7560759.jpg


336_Georges_St_Pierre_vs_Johny_Hendricks_gallery_post.0.0.jpg


Don’t think I can remember another instance there champ retires in his prime after a gift decision?
Click to expand...
There was talk of him doing that before the fight even took place.
 
This one is forgotten and I think was more of a clear robbery.... Lawler vs. Condit.

Round Lawler Sig. Strikes Condit Sig. Strikes
1 12 28
2 11 18
3 11 22
4 6 47
5 53 62

MEDIA SCORES
Nick Baldwin
BloodyElbow.com 48-47 Lawler
John Pollock
Fight Network 48-47 Lawler
Rob Young
CombatPress.com 48-47 Lawler
Nathan McCarter
BleacherReport.com 48-48 DRAW
Dallas Winston
BloodyElbow.com 48-48 DRAW
Dave Meltzer
Wrestling Observer 47-48 Condit
Luke Thomas
MMAFighting.com 47-48 Condit
MMAMania.com 47-48 Condit
Brian Knapp
Sherdog.com 47-48 Condit
Tristen Critchfield
Sherdog.com 47-48 Condit
MMAJunkie.com 47-48 Condit
Craig Amos
BleacherReport.com 47-48 Condit
MMABrasil.com.br 47-48 Condit
Paul Fontaine
WrestlingObserver.com 47-48 Condit
Jim Edwards
MMALatestNews.com 47-48 Condit
SevereMMA.com 47-48 Condit
Jason Floyd
TheMMAReport.com 47-48 Condit
Adrian MacNair
MMAMania.com 47-48 Condit
Rob Tatum
CombatPress.com 47-48 Condit
Chris Nelson
Sherdog.com 46-49 Condit
 
FlyingDeathKick said:
How does somebody retire after that?
Click to expand...

The decision was made before the fight ever happened, for several weeks leading up to the fight GSP and Firas said he had an announcement coming after the fight.

The only reason why he didn't say it before the fight, is because he didn't want it to over shadow the fight itself.
 
Nam Khan vs LeonardGarcia. Fucking brutally bad man.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,419
Messages
55,419,048
Members
174,765
Latest member
durbanik916

Share this page

Back
Top