Law Texas GOP removes teaching KKK as "morally wrong", removes MLK, Native Americas, etc from curriculum

{<huh}

CRT is a meaningless term if it is being used to describe MLK now.
The right wing posters attribute a lot of bs to crt that isn’t crt. Crt is just a full blown boogeyman for them at this point. I don’t think a single one of them had even bothered to google it and read what it actually entails
 
The right wing posters attribute a lot of bs to crt that isn’t crt. Crt is just a full blown boogeyman for them at this point. I don’t think a single one of them had even bothered to google it and read what it actually entails

You're only right in the academic sense. However, you'd be being intellectually dishonest if you don't concede that progressives have held up the likes of Robin Diangelo and other race essentialists as examples of who we should be following--often referring to their ideas as CRT when they are not.

It's not the right's fault that actual progressive CRT professors and theorists aren't speaking out more loudly against racist quacks like Diangelo. They've allowed CRT to be hijacked, and the meaning has shifted because of it.

It reminds me of an Islamic leader who won't stand up to Islamic extremism but likes to use "that's not Islam" to defend his beliefs. Proponents of an ideology that is being hijacked should be the most outspoken, not the most quiet.
 
They're using "CRT" to describe anything and everything that triggers them.

War is hell.

CRT megathread
https://forums.sherdog.com/posts/165530908/

Social - Ford defends removing anti-racism text from math curriculum | Sherdog Forums

This guy is fucking hilarious and I hope he makes you feel uncomfortable



That clown reminds me of Beau of the Fifth Column

It doesn't imply that the KKK wasn't bad. The clown probably hasn't even read up on Native American history. What students would get is only white man bad and everyone else was innocent angels. The vast majority of world history was brutal and violent. Painting with a broad communist brush is what they want.

Today, social cohesion is important so that communism can be defeated.
 
Last edited:
They are also banning Ben and Jerry ice cream. But the right doesn’t like cancel culture!!!
 
Exactly how are they supposed to teach the Holocaust, or slavery, "without giving deference to any one perspective."

By remembering there were good people......mighty fine people......on both sides.

<BC1>
 
CRT has been around since the 70s, but right wing dolts only care about it now because they've exhausted all of their BLM whining
 
I wasn't aware this thread is exclusively about MLK.

You said "Good. CRT has no place in the classroom" in response to a thread about MLK, Cesar Chavez, Susan B Anthony, and native American history being removed from school curriculum.
 
You said "Good. CRT has no place in the classroom" in response to a thread about MLK, Cesar Chavez, Susan B Anthony, and native American history being removed from school curriculum.
It wasn't, you fell for outright fake news.

I already posted the link to the actual bill twice ITT where those things are specifically mentioned as what is supposed to be taught. The lazy Karens at Huffington post wrote this piece because they didn't read the bill where it lists what is supposed to be taught, and then separates how you are not supposed to teach it, ie telling kids it's their fault because of their skin color.
 
You said "Good. CRT has no place in the classroom" in response to a thread about MLK, Cesar Chavez, Susan B Anthony, and native American history being removed from school curriculum.
I replied to the wrong post. I meant to reply to this : "CRT is a meaningless term if it is being used to describe MLK now."
 
Like almost everything else you post around here this will turn out to be false.
Had a feeling it wouldn't be what HuffPo and Queen B claim, you can read the room when it was only the peanut gallery doing drive-by 1-liners in at the tail-end of the thread.
 
So did they actually eliminate it from the cirriculum? Because the article you posted says they just removed the requirement to teach it.
 
Here read the what it actually states and TS is a dumb as troll as are the people just agreeing with whatever the left says it is.

Yes it's a wall of text but try to put down your Twitter "new source " long enough to actually know what it reads.

AN ACT
relating to the social studies curriculum in public schools.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Section 28.002, Education Code, is amended by
adding Subsections (h-2), (h-3), (h-4), and (h-5) to read as
follows:
(h-2) In adopting the essential knowledge and skills for the
social studies curriculum, the State Board of Education shall adopt
essential knowledge and skills that develop each student's civic
knowledge, including an understanding of:
(1) the fundamental moral, political, and
intellectual foundations of the American experiment in
self-government;
(2) the history, qualities, traditions, and features
of civic engagement in the United States;
(3) the history of Native Americans;
(4) the structure, function, and processes of
government institutions at the federal, state, and local levels;
(5) the founding documents of the United States,
including:
(A) the Declaration of Independence;
(B) the United States Constitution;
(C) the Federalist Papers;
(D) the transcript of the first Lincoln-Douglas
debate;
(E) the writings of and about the founding
fathers and mothers and other founding persons of the United
States, including the writings of:
(i) George Washington;
(ii) Ona Judge;
(iii) Thomas Jefferson;
(iv) Sally Hemings; and
(v) any other founding persons of the
United States;
(F) writings from Frederick Douglass's
newspaper, the North Star;
(G) the Book of Negroes;
(H) the Fugitive Slave Acts of 1793 and 1850;
(I) the Indian Removal Act;
(J) Thomas Jefferson's letter to the Danbury
Baptists; and
(K) William Still's Underground Railroad
Records;
(6) historical documents related to the civic
accomplishments of marginalized populations, including documents
related to:
(A) the Chicano movement;
(B) women's suffrage and equal rights;
(C) the civil rights movement;
(D) the Snyder Act of 1924; and
(E) the American labor movement;
(7) the history of white supremacy, including but not
limited to the institution of slavery, the eugenics movement, and
the Ku Klux Klan, and the ways in which it is morally wrong;
(8) the history and importance of the civil rights
movement, including the following documents:
(A) Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from a
Birmingham Jail" and "I Have a Dream" speech;
(B) the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42
U.S.C. Section 2000a et seq.);
(C) the United States Supreme Court's decision in
Brown v. Board of Education;;
(D) the Emancipation Proclamation;
(E) the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
(F) the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth
Amendments to the United States Constitution;
(G) the United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit decision in Mendez v. Westminster;
(H) Frederick Douglass's Narrative of the Life of
Frederick Douglass, an American Slave;;
(I) the life and work of Cesar Chavez; and
(J) the life and work of Dolores Huerta;
(9) the history and importance of the women's suffrage
movement, including the following documents:
(A) the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (52
U.S.C. Section 10101 et seq.);
(B) the Fifteenth, Nineteenth, and Twenty-Sixth
Amendments to the United States Constitution;
(C) Abigail Adams's letter "Remember the
Ladies";
(D) the works of Susan B. Anthony; and
(E) the Declaration of Sentiments;
(10) the life and works of Dr. Hector P. Garcia;
(11) the American GI Forum;
(12) the League of United Latin American Citizens; and
(13) Hernandez v. Texas (1954).
(h-3) For any social studies course in the required
curriculum:
(1) a teacher may not be compelled to discuss a
particular current event or widely debated and currently
controversial issue of public policy or social affairs;
(2) a teacher who chooses to discuss a topic described
by Subdivision (1) shall, to the best of the teacher's ability,
strive to explore the topic from diverse and contending
perspectives without giving deference to any one perspective;
(3) a school district, open-enrollment charter
school, or teacher may not require, make part of a course, or award
a grade or course credit, including extra credit, for a student's:
(A) political activism, lobbying, or efforts to
persuade members of the legislative or executive branch at the
federal, state, or local level to take specific actions by direct
communication; or
(B) participation in any internship, practicum,
or similar activity involving social or public policy advocacy; and
(4) a teacher, administrator, or other employee of a
state agency, school district, or open-enrollment charter school
may not:
(A) be required to engage in training,
orientation, or therapy that presents any form of race or sex
stereotyping or blame on the basis of race or sex;
(B) require or make part of a course the concept
that:
(i) one race or sex is inherently superior
to another race or sex;
(ii) an individual, by virtue of the
individual's race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or
oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously;
(iii) an individual should be discriminated
against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of
the individual's race;
(iv) members of one race or sex cannot and
should not attempt to treat others without respect to race or sex;
(v) an individual's moral character,
standing, or worth is necessarily determined by the individual's
race or sex;
(vi) an individual, by virtue of the
individual's race or sex, bears responsibility for actions
committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex;
(vii) an individual should feel discomfort,
guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on
account of the individual's race or sex;
(viii) meritocracy or traits such as a hard
work ethic are racist or sexist or were created by members of a
particular race to oppress members of another race;
(ix) the advent of slavery in the territory
that is now the United States constituted the true founding of the
United States; or
(x) with respect to their relationship to
American values, slavery and racism are anything other than
deviations from, betrayals of, or failures to live up to, the
authentic founding principles of the United States, which include
liberty and equality; and
(C) require an understanding of The 1619 Project.
(h-4) A state agency, school district, or open-enrollment
charter school may not accept private funding for the purpose of
developing a curriculum, purchasing or selecting curriculum
materials, or providing teacher training or professional
development for a course described by Subsection (h-3)(3).
(h-5) A school district or open-enrollment charter school
may not implement, interpret, or enforce any rules or student code
of conduct in a manner that would result in the punishment of a
student for discussing, or have a chilling effect on student
discussion of, the concepts described by Subsection (h-3)(4).
SECTION 2. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b) of
this section, this Act applies beginning with the 2021-2022 school
year.
(b) Section 28.002(h-2), Education Code, as added by this
Act, applies beginning with the 2022-2023 school year.
SECTION 3. Not later than December 31, 2022, the State Board
of Education shall review and revise, as needed, the essential
knowledge and skills of the social studies curriculum as required
by Section 28.002(h-2), Education Code, as added by this Act.
SECTION 4. If any provision of this Act or its application
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does
not affect other provisions or applications of this Act that can be
given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to
this end the provisions of this Act are declared to be severable.
SECTION 5. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this
Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
Act takes effect September 1, 2021.


______________________________ ______________________________
President of the Senate Speaker of the House


I certify that H.B. No. 3979 was passed by the House on May
11, 2021, by the following vote: Yeas 79, Nays 65, 2 present, not
voting.

______________________________
Chief Clerk of the House


I certify that H.B. No. 3979 was passed by the Senate, with
amendments, on May 22, 2021, by the following vote: Yeas 18, Nays
13; and that the Senate adopted a motion to recede from amendments
to H.B. No. 3979 on May 28, 2021, and declared H.B. No. 3979 to have
passed the Senate in the same form in which it was received from the
House by the following vote: Yeas 18, Nays 13.

______________________________
Secretary of the Senate
APPROVED: _____________________
Date

_____________________
Governor
 
Convincing the thoughtless that there's an attempt to turn children into white supremacists is an obvious play in the playbook. I mean, how scary and terrible right? We can't allow the terrible and scary indoctrination to occur, we must control the narrative for good, with the good message and to teach children the right way to think! No exceptions, no deviation, there must be proper thought, you know, so the world is perfect and not scary...

... Also... don't look over there, that's not important...

*Edit: there's a zero percent chance ts is using proper context, or any even remotely accurate context... I'd guess...
 
You're only right in the academic sense. However, you'd be being intellectually dishonest if you don't concede that progressives have held up the likes of Robin Diangelo and other race essentialists as examples of who we should be following--often referring to their ideas as CRT when they are not.

It's not the right's fault that actual progressive CRT professors and theorists aren't speaking out more loudly against racist quacks like Diangelo. They've allowed CRT to be hijacked, and the meaning has shifted because of it.

It reminds me of an Islamic leader who won't stand up to Islamic extremism but likes to use "that's not Islam" to defend his beliefs. Proponents of an ideology that is being hijacked should be the most outspoken, not the most quiet.
Muslim leaders always condemn terrorists and extremists and yet smooth brains will still ask "why da Muslim no condemn?".

In this case a lot of what gets attributed to CRT isn't actually CRT and its mostly spread within the social media bubbles of right wing mouthbreathers so not exactly a lot that CRT academics can do to reach such folks.
 
Muslim leaders always condemn terrorists and extremists

They condemn. The hold vigils for victims and raise money to support them. They turn over anyone suspected of violence to the police and make it clear that the doors of mosques will be closed to anyone involved in terrorism.
 
They condemn. The hold vigils for victims and raise money to support them. They turn over anyone suspected of violence to the police and make it clear that the doors of mosques will be closed to anyone involved in terrorism.
The burgers in the war room always ignore this, like they ignore so many other things.
 
Muslim leaders always condemn terrorists and extremists and yet smooth brains will still ask "why da Muslim no condemn?".

In this case a lot of what gets attributed to CRT isn't actually CRT and its mostly spread within the social media bubbles of right wing mouthbreathers so not exactly a lot that CRT academics can do to reach such folks.
The fact that you say "always" as an absolute statement already shows us you're lying. There has never been a single authority in the Islamic world who didn't condemn violence or terrorism?

Or are you cherry picking Muslim leaders just like you're cherry picking your holy book?
 
Teaching evolution. Yes that is the reality
Too bad you're so uneducated that you don't even understand the basic premise that abiogenesis and evolution are two entirely different discussions that have nothing to do with one another.

Mind you most of the religious dummies also don't understand this premise either, so consider yourself no worse off than your average retard.
 
And again the leftists nuts prove just as dumb am gullible as the Q nuts.
 
Back
Top