- Joined
- Feb 1, 2004
- Messages
- 6,310
- Reaction score
- 2,637
Utter nonsense. You've swallowed the propaganda.
If you have a skillset that others can't defend and you fall back on it when your other moves aren't working.... That is called being every grappler ever.
They're only desperation moves because they're a trump card to the hobbled and crippled grapplers that mindless adherence to IBJJF rule sets produces.
If a blue belt goes for a leg lock on me because I'm smashing him, I counter it and go back to smashing him. This is because I don't dismiss them as cheap and neglect them like the unloved stepchildren of BJJ. On the other hand, when I catch much better grapplers than me with leg locks that is on them, not me, for having a gaping hole in their game.
No different than someone who just doesn't know how to defend the brabo/guillotine/anaconda series. It doesn't make them cheap, it means they should work on their head-and-arm.
I think I didn't say what I meant clearly enough. I think leglocks are fine, and I'm OK at them. But it's true most people don't work them much and don't defend them well (esp. in bjj) and I would rather do something more challenging, work for sweeps and chokes, etc. Definitely it is a legit technique, and I don't in any way begrudge the TS for using it on that kid. I was just kind of echoing what someone else said that he must have been in trouble for myself, i.e. I usually do it if I'm in trouble. It's not my go to by any means.