Syrian war fueled by pipeline

Last Samurai

Gold Belt
@Gold
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
19,339
Reaction score
237
A Pipeline War

In their view, our war against Bashar Assad did not begin with the peaceful civil protests of the Arab Spring in 2011. Instead it began in 2000 when Qatar proposed to construct a $10 billion, 1,500km pipeline through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey.

syriapipelinewar750.jpg

the purple line traces the proposed
Qatar-Turkey natural gas pipeline

The proposed pipeline would have linked Qatar directly to European energy markets via distribution terminals in Turkey which would pocket rich transit fees. The Qatar/Turkey pipeline would have given the Sunni Kingdoms of the Persian Gulf decisive domination of world natural gas markets and strengthen Qatar, America’s closest ally in the Arab world. Qatar hosts two massive American military bases and the U.S. Central Command’s Mid-East headquarters.

The EU, which gets 30 percent of its gas from Russia, was equally hungry for the pipeline which would have given its members cheap energy and relief from Vladimir Putin’s stifling economic and political leverage. Turkey, Russia’s second largest gas customer, was particularly anxious to end its reliance on its ancient rival and to position itself as the lucrative transect hub for Asian fuels to EU markets. The Qatari pipeline would have benefited Saudi Arabia’s conservative Sunni Monarchy by giving them a foothold in Shia dominated Syria.

The Saudi’s geopolitical goal is to contain the economic and political power of the Kingdom’s principal rival, Iran, a Shiite state, and close ally of Bashar Assad. The Saudi monarchy viewed the U.S. sponsored Shia takeover in Iraq as a demotion to its regional power and was already engaged in a proxy war against Tehran in Yemen, highlighted by the Saudi genocide against the Iranian backed Houthi tribe.

Of course, the Russians, who sell 70 percent of their gas exports to Europe, viewed the Qatar/Turkey pipeline as an existential threat. In Putin’s view, the Qatar pipeline is a NATO plot to change the status quo, deprive Russia of its only foothold in the Middle East, strangle the Russian economy and end Russian leverage in the European energy market. In 2009, Assad announced that he would refuse to sign the agreement to allow the pipeline to run through Syria “to protect the interests of our Russian ally.”

Assad further enraged the Gulf’s Sunni monarchs by endorsing a Russian approved “Islamic pipeline” running from Iran’s side of the gas field through Syria and to the ports of Lebanon. The Islamic pipeline would make Shia Iran instead of Sunni Qatar, the principal supplier to the European energy market and dramatically increase Tehran’s influence in the Mid-East and the world. Israel also was understandably determined to derail the Islamic pipeline which would enrich Iran and Syria and presumably strengthen their proxies, Hezbollah and Hamas.

Secret cables and reports by the U.S., Saudi and Israeli intelligence agencies indicate that the moment Assad rejected the Qatari pipeline, military and intelligence planners quickly arrived at the consensus that fomenting a Sunni uprising in Syria to overthrow the uncooperative Bashar Assad was a feasible path to achieving the shared objective of completing the Qatar/Turkey gas link. In 2009, according to WikiLeaks, soon after Bashar Assad rejected the Qatar pipeline, the CIA began funding opposition groups in Syria.


source: http://ecowatch.com/2016/02/25/robert-kennedy-jr-syria-pipeline-war/


tl:dr

The Syrian war is the result of President Assad saying no to a pipeline that Saudi, Qatar and the West wanted to build.


this is old news, but it makes me think of all the current affairs that can be attributed to this stupid pipeline
- the arab spring
- the war in Syria
- the immigration crisis in europe
- the rise of ISIS
 
I'm sure this is all true but that's not mutually exclusive to an organic resistance movement forming on its own in response to the various circumstances within Syria. Here's an interesting factor that was possibly working to destabilize Syria as well; climate change
A severe drought, worsened by a warming climate, drove Syrian farmers to abandon their crops and flock to cities, helping trigger a civil war that has killed hundreds of thousands of people, according to a new study published Monday.

The research provides the most detailed look yet at how climate change may already be helping spark violent political unrest.

"Up until now we've understood and established that changes in climate may affect human conflict in the future. But everything until now has stopped short of saying climate change is already having an effect," says Solomon Hsiang, a University of California, Berkeley professor who has studied the role of climate change in violence. He did not participate in the new study.

The authors acknowledge that many factors led to Syria's uprising, including corrupt leadership, inequality, massive population growth, and the government's inability to curb human suffering.

But their report, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, compiled statistics showing that water shortages in the Fertile Crescent in Syria, Iraq, and Turkey killed livestock, drove up food prices, sickened children, and forced 1.5 million rural residents to the outskirts of Syria's jam-packed cities—just as that country was exploding with immigrants from the Iraq war.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2015/03/150302-syria-war-climate-change-drought/

If Syria was ruled by a democratic, honest, and/or competent government it might've avoided all this. But its not, its ruled by by iron fist that's been rotted by corruption.
 
well climate change affects the entire region, but you don't see Jordanians killing each other in the streets
 
The war in Syria was planned around 2009 in London. These are the words of Roland Dumas, former France's foreign minister, you can make some researches.

As Michel Collon stated, there are 5 rules of war propaganda, and the Syrian war perfectly illustrate them:

1. Hide the reals interests
Our governments are fighting for human rights, peace or some other noble ideal. Never present the war as a conflict for economical interests.

2. Demonize the adversary

To get public support, prepare each war with a large spectacular media lie. Then continue to demonize the adversary particularly showing atrocity images.

3. Pretend to be the victim's advocate
Always present you as defending the victims, when doing so-called humanitarian wars.

4. Hide History

Hide the history and geography of the region, which makes incomprehensible local conflicts fueled or provoked by the great powers themselves.

5. Monopolize the information and prevent debate
Avoid serious reminder of the previous media manipulation. This would make the public suspicious too.
 
Last edited:
That was a long but great article, thanks TS.

If only more people could read these kind of analysis they would have a better understanding of what is really going on in M.E.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't doubt it played a factor. Especially with Saudi funding and Isis. My thoughts on Syria was Wikileaks taught us was the Bush admin. were beginning efforts to undermine Assad's regime around 2006.

So as this is beginning, Syria is hit with a devastating drought that forces thousands into the cities. IMO the Saudis began fueling this fire to drop Assad.
 
Interesting quote from the article :

Clemente compares ISIS to Colombia’s FARC—a drug cartel with a revolutionary ideology to inspire its foot soldiers. “You have to think of ISIS as an oil cartel,” Clemente said. “In the end, money is the governing rationale. The religious ideology is a tool that inspires its soldiers to give their lives for an oil cartel.”
 
well climate change affects the entire region, but you don't see Jordanians killing each other in the streets
Poor water and food security was one of the driving forces in the Arab Spring in general. Of course each country is unique so things played out differently. You've got Tunisia on one end which removed their dictator peacefully and transitioned to democracy and Syria on the other where everything went to hell in a hand basket.
 
Why don't they build a pipeline through Jordan-Israel-the mediterranean?

Avoid Syria.
 
T
4. Hide History
Hide the history and geography of the region, which makes incomprehensible local conflicts fueled or provoked by the great powers themselves.

How do you hide geography? maps are a thing
 
This has been posted / suggested before and was met with intense flaming.

typo edit**
 
Last edited:
How do you hide geography? maps are a thing
And how many Americans can read a map of the Middle East? Or make the connections between geography and geopolitics? The media certainly isn't helping on that end.
 
It's always really interesting to read about all the factors that go into unrest and war, and compare them to which factors are used to argue for a particular position in a conflict, and then to see which ones become prominent in history and in the public discourse.
 
Back
Top