- Joined
- Jul 21, 2007
- Messages
- 11,868
- Reaction score
- 875
I'm in a hurry so it will suffice to say, it's actually rather amusing to be called a racist for wanting controlled immigration and acknowledging the strain on the Swedish society due to immigration from certain areas of the world. Even if I were an alarmist, that wouldn't make me racist.I did not call you a Nazi. I correctly pointed out that you used an argument - that Swedes have "hard-working blood" - that was expressly used by the Nazis. More than being ashamed that you used an argument also used by Nazis, you should be embarrassed that you used an argument so fucking stupid and ludicrous. The "hard-working" argument (setting aside the implicit biological argument re "blood") is the same one used by nationalists in the United States - a country in which the average worker works much longer hours and is more productive than in Sweden - to disparage Mexican immigrants despite said Mexican immigrants working excessive hours in brutal manual labor positions, oftentimes absent employment and labor regulations and protections.
Also, yes, @Son of Jamin is absolutely a racist. That he, like you, is sensible in non-racist-adjacent discussions, only shows that he's smart enough to not spend all his posts here making race/immigration alarmist threads. Instead, the both of you are more comparable to California limousine liberals who supposedly champion reason and compassion, and rightfully disdain barbarism and stupidity on the right, yet engage in the same sort of exclusionary reactions the minute you're threatened or the right thing becomes momentarily challenging or even just separated from your own self-interest. I can only assume that the other posters that are cheer leading you here - Happy Man, uppercutbus, Black Confederate (lol, you're welcome to litigate that one), etc. - are so openly hateful and racist that even you cannot dare to defend them.
I think you, and some of the people you describe, have been known and exposed for some time, such as in 2011 when the Danish right started gaining momentum - momentum they would clearly use to take an ax to the welfare state - based on anti-immigration sentiment even before the refugee crisis. This has and will continue to be the glaring weak spot in social democracy: it is susceptible to regressive capitalist reactions, where self-interested right-wingers will attempt to leverage whatever social policy/issue is most powerful into looting the welfare state. The Swedish right, just like the American right and the British right, will eventually use racism to tear down the public good, and, such as shown in the post I originally quoted, you're expressly okay with that. You want the country to go bankrupt so that you can kick out immigrants. You're probably fully aware of longstanding studies into the issue showing assimilation after a generation, but you are hoping you can boot them out before that happens.
But anywho, at least you didn't call me a socialist, that would have hurt.