I was like you guys, wondering why there was no focus whatsoever on the cop that shot an unarmed man outside his house.
I found this long and detailed article, explaining the entire situation.
https://amp.kansas.com/news/local/crime/article208738719.html?__twitter_impression=true
In short, this was an absolute tragic situation, but with what the cops knew before the shot was fired, it was a justified shooting.
Yeah, we all wish cops weren't so trigger happy, based on the few situations in which mistakes were made. However we caren't cops, and have no idea what it is like to have our lives on the line, having to make split-second decisions in the amount of time it can take for a suspect could whip out a gun and fire a round.
Once again, this is a tragedy for everyone involved.
One thing is for sure - the family of the victim is going to be pah-pah-pah-pah-PAID in the civil case against the city as they fucking should be.
I do know what it’s like. 17 year veteran police lieutenant in charge of 16 officers on my shift and a district of 15,000 people. I have been in dozens of situations where guns were drawn, suspects were armed, shouted commands were given-often with suspects shouting back and lots of bystanders making things worse, and I have been shot at. In one case, two officers were shot at, with the bullet hitting the small portion of the car between the front door and the rear door. Three inches to the front, and an officer(my former partner of two years) would have been shot in the face.
I have had my gun on dozens of suspects, including two different people during my very first week on the job-one was after a pursuit with a semi truck, the second-two days later, was during a raid on a hotel room where drug dealers were holding a woman against her will. I was second through the door and broke off to the right, entering the first door, which happened to be the bathroom where a guy was taking a piss with a gun on the sink behind him. Add a foot pursuit, and I had a very busy, and interesting first week in uniform.
I can tell you that in these situations, your adrenaline is pumping like you could never imagine. You feel this throbbing in your temples, which fucks with your vision and hearing-called auditory exclusion-where you temporarily lose hearing in one, or both ears. It can make sounds or in this case, commands, distorted. Add tunnel vision, where your peripheral vision is cut down up to 70%, with things happening and unfolding at such a fast rate, and your decision making would normally be. In a weird turn of events, time also seems to slow down or speed up depending on the person. For me, it slows down and then when it is over, everything speeds up and it is like playing catch-up, especially after the adrenaline dump hits and you suddenly become exhausted, your limbs don’t want to work, and you have some memory loss(it often completely or partially comes back over the next few days, usually after sleep).
As for these officers, and the distance at which this happened, in low light, with the nature of the false call-murder with two other potential victims, I completely understand why that officer fired that shot. The officers were not necessarily at immediate risk of harm, even if he had a gun, but the reported hostages is the real issue. You have the suspect in the sights of your scope, and after being told to keep his hands up, his one hand drops out of sight towards the door frame. Combined with the shouting, the distance, the adrenaline and fear(no it is not a cowardly emotion, but a completely normal and natural response),it is scary, confusing and very chaotic , and when combined with such a crazy and dangerous call, made-up or not, the officer took the shot.
Based upon the Graham v Conor factors and the TNv garner cases, I agree with the choice to not charge that officer. He believed that the subject was either going for a gun or going to dart inside the house, which i would have done, then negotiated an exit. But that cop believed that if he did not take that shit, people would die.
As for the ass-stains that called this in: I say voluntary manslaughter for the actual caller, and conspiracy to illicit a crime or
complicitcity-whatever the crime is called there-here, it would be conspiracy to commit manslaughter because this person was the architect of this crime.
These little turds cost a man his life, and they thought it would be funny for a swat team to show up to this guy’s house and kick in his door and arrest or detain him until they figured it out. All because someone got team-killed and that person was angry so he illicited someone to orchastrste this. Bunch of little bitches. In addition to their crimes and ultimate sentences, I believe that their thumbs should be removed, which would greatly restrict their ability to ever play video games or type on a computer forever as well as greatly affecting how they got about in the world. This would affect everything from masturbation to simply grabbing simple objects, and every time they get frustrated that they can’t grab a book off a shelf to not being able to poor milk on cereal very easily-and this will remind them of what they had done. And finally, for the kid that gave the wrong address that ultimately cost a man his life, I believe he may be guilty of reckless endangerment, as at the very least, he thought that he was sending this guy to the wrong house to beat his ass, swat that house, or at the very least, harass an innocent person by sending pizzas or escorts or something else being sent to that house. So he is also guilty.
In closing, fuck these guys with a pineapple