Straight Strikes Vs Circular Strikes

Discussion in 'Standup Technique' started by marks, Mar 30, 2008.

  1. marks Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Each type of strike can be used for different situations but which types of strikes do feel tend to be more effective, straight or circular.


    MarksChat
    Fighting and Training Methods for Unarmed Martial Artists
     
  2. Vector_X Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2007
    Messages:
    3,290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    I prefer the straight over a looping strike. Basically the straight is quicker because a straight line is shorter than a circular one. Second, I can get my hips and shoulders behind a straight as opposed to just my shoulder and arm so it packs a bit more pain.
     
  3. Rinksterk** Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Messages:
    5,274
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hades
    Weird question.

    Depends highly on the individual and situation.
     
  4. Chonbody Guest

    Do you plan on training, 'cuz you should.

    To answer your question, it depends, I personally prefer the straight unless the dude you are hitting is wobblin', and even then you're taking the risk of him catching you with a "straight" punch.
     
  5. Depends on the situation, generally I would chooses straights but hooks pack alot of punch and probaly have more KO power.
     
  6. Azy Yellow Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2007
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would say the straight unless you are built like a brick and naturally feel better going for hooks. Ever seen an old man punch? Very straight, little effort and hurts like hell.
     
  7. Vector_X Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2007
    Messages:
    3,290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    So my question is does he consider a hook a circular strike or is he talking about a real looping hook? My hook of course has a circular motion, but I tend to keep my hook in tight and since I don't do MMA I would rarely throw a really looping hook. This kind of question I think is probably being asked by someone who hasn't trained because everyone I'd hope knows that you really do need both so I guess the answer is yes please.
     
  8. marks Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Very true. The elder people do tend to pick there punches and generally use straight ones.
     
  9. No Quarter Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Messages:
    618
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Pittsburghe, Transylvania
    The shortest distance between 2 points is a straight line.
     
  10. Gavin Smith Amateur Fighter

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2007
    Messages:
    303
    Likes Received:
    0
    Personally I prefer circular (I'm assuming the ts means hooks and upper cuts, not just big over hand haymakers)
    But thats just my style, I'm agressive and I like to fight on the inside.

    Obviously you need to mix them in with straight punches to be effective, as someone already pointed out "the shortest distance between two points is indead a straight line"
     
  11. hulkout White Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think with straight punches, you have a better chance of landing it, but with circular punches, they pack more power. Jabs and crosses are faster, but if you get hit with a hard hook punch or a sow choy (from Choy Lay Fut), it's lights out.
     
  12. fightingrabbit Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    13,179
    Likes Received:
    0
    This'll be somewhat of a lengthy lesson in history and fisticuffs. here goes..

    Read in a book that a straight is where its at. It mentioned that years ago, when we were still using swords as main weapons of combat and war. There were many different sword designs used for war.

    Some regions of the world developed round curve bladed swords designed primarily for slicing and cutting. These curved swords however had limited effect against the enemies armor. As they were meant for slicing and not penetrating. Thus making it only so effective in battle.

    They mentioned that the Romans were on 'point' (no pun intended) with their Gladius short sword and shield. As this sword was made for cutting also but MAINLY stabbing and thrusting. It was also made shorter so its distance to the enemy in battle was less and it was quicker and more capable of thrusting through armor into the vital points because it had a 'straight' sharp point.

    As opposed to the curved sword having to swing it sideways making it a slower path of travel to reach the enemy, and being only able to inflict lacerations but not being able to poke through armor.

    Now lets take a look at how it correlates with boxing. You got your hook (circular strike) and you got your jab and straight right.

    The way the hook is thrown only gives you so much penetration. As its thrown circular and on an arc. Those of you who box a little know a hook is relatively easy to negate and block with just a glove or arm up.

    A straight or jab like the Roman Gladius however, offers much more power, thrust and penetration as well as being quicker on the draw. You can shoot the straight far into his abdomen, face, poke it through the openings in his guard. Where as the hook, you're limited to banging away on his guard just like the curved sword trying to slice through armor. You see the relation?

    In theory our arms are like swords and we use them in almost the same way. To parry, to thrust, to swing. Just like we would in a sword fight.

    Its amazing how sword combat and its theories influenced the science of Boxing so much huh? I found it fascinating myself.
     
  13. Rinksterk** Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Messages:
    5,274
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hades
    no offense dude, but that's not a very good argument. The gladius was short because the technology at the time didn't have the ability to make long swords. Swords became much longer as technology advanced. Look at the swords from the medieval period. Roman swords got longer in the later period as well. If shorter swords were better, why would they make them longer and abandon short swords? and straight swords aren't necessarily better than curved swords either. the japanese katana is curved and samurai weren't exactly lightly armored.

    I think just like anything else, each weapon or punch has its place depending on your opponent and situation. There's a reason people developed straight swords, curved swords, spears, flails, and so on. Some dudes are more susceptible of eating hooks, some dudes have trouble defending straights.
     
  14. WNYguy Green Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,038
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Saratoga Springs, NY
    You clearly need both. Getting in/closing the distance is usually best done with straights, cause they have more reach, while in tight hooking punches can cover angles straights can't and catch an opponenent in a blind spot etc... One is not better than the other its like high kicks v low kicks, use them both and they both land more. :icon_twis
     
  15. Smw Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,984
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Playing Hockey
    It's different for everyone, but for me personally it would be the straight punches. I'm a boxer for the most part and I rely on the quickness of my jab and cross.
     
  16. Stand-Up! Yellow Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    0
    You don't really need to throw too many hooks in MMA. The gloves are so small you can throw straight down the pipe all day. It's all really relative to whether you are doing boxing or MMA. We spar with 14 0z. gloves in our MMA class. Big-ass gloves change the game completely.
     
  17. right hand lead Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,616
    Likes Received:
    61
    Location:
    training pros (in AK)
    i prefer straight punches. suits me better since im taller than most people around my weight
     

Share This Page

X
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.