I don't think that's true. Ask your Mom and let us know.Women like to be manhandled, you beta buzzfeed-reading cuck
Gus? What am I missing? I didnt read the OP lolOne diference is Gus served his tine while Hardy bought his way out of it?
If your dick ever been anywhere near a vagina you'd know.I don't think...
I like man.If your dick ever been anywhere near a vagina you'd know.
Everyone talks about Greg "A level Athlete" Hardy and him being a DIRTY Woman beater but did you know the Swedish gent is a little rat as well
Hardy isn't the only abuser in the UFC
https://bleacherreport.com/articles...on-served-15-months-in-swedish-prison-for-gbh
a keyboard warrior calling the #1 contender at LHW a rat for something he did 15 years ago, heck you even had to search for a 5 years old article
I have pointed this out before but Rumble Johnson also has 2 incidents of domestic violence/violence against women
As does floyd, as does many others athletes...
Somehow Hardy got picked up for christ on a cross
Its disgusting how people want to virtue signal over him.
Im not siding with him at all... but this is being completely overblown out of proportion, and its sad to watch.
I don't necessarily think that it's being blown out of proportion. People are entitled to their outrage, and are even entitled to protest and boycott his fights.
I do, however, think that a guy who is not currently in prison has not only a right, but also a responsibility, to find himself gainful employment.
I also think that an employer has the right to decide whether they will employ a particular employee (or sign a particular independent contractor) based on their own interests. Those interests get complex with a guy like Hardy, of course, because he may end up costing them in public opinion more than he makes them in gate and PPV revenues. But it's still their right to make that calculation.
It's also the right of the customer to decide what they do or do not want to consume, for whatever reason, however arbitrary or "unfair" their whims might seem, and this is their proper path to influencing the decisions of the employer.
It's no one's right, though, to simply demand that the business that has deemed an employment/contract relationship to be in its best interests must forgo dealings with a man who is seeking gainful employment, just because some random people unrelated to the relationship at hand think it should be so.
What about Travis?yeah, many mma fans are hypocrites. and what about travis browne?
Sure man, everybody has a right to their opinion.
Im just saying that COMPARED to what we've seen before with similar examples, Gregs case is without a doubt being scrutinized the most. Fact.
Whether you want to say all of the others should have gotten the same attention or whatever your prerrogative is...
No.
My point is nobody talks about gus and other who are doing it
People call gus a great guy
Both should be given equal treatment by the fandom
Yeah ya did.Clearly Race
I was gonna bring that up but didn’t want to race bait