Stop trying to hype Michael Chandler

MigitAs

Red Belt
@red
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Messages
8,124
Reaction score
11,125
This guy lost:
The rematch against Eddie
Two fights against <FookIsThatGuy>
and a leg tko to <FookIsThatGuy>
And got knocked the fuck out by
<FookIsThatGuy>

I’m sorry but casuals have no idea who Pitbull is.

also his physique is sus.

Finally he’s old, turns 35 in April.
so stop trying to hype this guy who hasn’t proven himself against elite competition in a USADA environment. He’s not gonna pull an Eddie Alvarez and grab the belt from any of the killers in the UFC LW top 5.

Go ahead and bump this when they feed him to Tony.
 
This guy lost:
The rematch against Eddie
Two fights against <FookIsThatGuy>
and a leg tko to <FookIsThatGuy>
And got knocked the fuck out by
<FookIsThatGuy>

I’m sorry but casuals have no idea who Pitbull is.

also his physique is sus.

Finally he’s old, turns 35 in April.
so stop trying to hype this guy who hasn’t proven himself against elite competition in a USADA environment. He’s not gonna pull an Eddie Alvarez and grab the belt from any of the killers in the UFC LW top 5.

Go ahead and bump this when they feed him to Tony.
I'm the only guy that post about michael chandler here for the most part. I post when hes's talking shit, when khabib talks shit about him and his highlights. That being said, I want to see tony whip his ass .

Chandler is annoying but him talking is working to some degree. I can't lie.
 
Lets be real he got robbed vs Edward.

Also the Primus fight was a fluke since Chand took him out in the rematch
 
Michael Chandler had to make his first fight at ufc before hype ! Just met make fast
 
But really, who are you talking to?
QfMH0nlKhfzkEU9nFXyPD7IWqQBV_vlYQpI8u1Gb-nzzNzrC_Ny2xf_2WmE5LXGKLTgp42Ued5yr4uxM4_n3WgPFOT-SMd5PQ2q6GkOEyhM5YA3N9KVLqJCa1ocStUedK9cMbOezu8wppQHCMblROtbGtib0V9IGWrk
 
He’s an exciting fighter who always brings it.
You hate those types of fighters?
Win or lose always going for the kill.

I can appreciate and root for that.

So many people think a banner a fighter fights under means they aren’t good.

whatbhas any bellator or elite xc. Or strike force or dream or etc. fighter ever done?

they are only good when they win a fight under a ufc banner?

Alvarez was a beast and went toe to toe with gaetje and finished him. Won the title in the ufc.

chsndler and Alvarez had great fights with each other
Pit bull is an absolute savage.


Ufc does such a great job at promoting there brand that fight fans can’t judge who is a fantastic fighter unless they fight in an octagon.

It’s pretty mind blowing.
 
I'd like to reserve my judgement, at least until I see him fight
 
Eddie vs Chandler 1 was literally one of the best fights of all time. Also Eddie became champ by knocking RDA out. Why does that detract from his ability to fight? Chandler is good but is like 34 now and his chin has seen better days. I think he can be successful but if his first fight is against Tony hes in for a long night.
 
This guy lost:
The rematch against Eddie
Two fights against <FookIsThatGuy>
and a leg tko to <FookIsThatGuy>
And got knocked the fuck out by
<FookIsThatGuy>

I’m sorry but casuals have no idea who Pitbull is.

also his physique is sus.

Finally he’s old, turns 35 in April.
so stop trying to hype this guy who hasn’t proven himself against elite competition in a USADA environment. He’s not gonna pull an Eddie Alvarez and grab the belt from any of the killers in the UFC LW top 5.

Go ahead and bump this when they feed him to Tony.

so why did tony say no if he a bum
 
No, I won't stop hyping Michael Chandler. I will hype Michael Chandler to the end of my days, and there's nothing you can do about it.

But really, who are you talking to?

You apparently.
 
Back
Top