Yup. I first learned what it was like in 1987, then again in 2000, again in 2008. It hasn't gotten real bad this year, yet. My father told me what it was like in '73-74 when the Nifty 50 collapsed.Bunch of market noobs are now finding out the hard way what trading in 2008 was like.
I expect a lot more blood before this is over.
DOW is a really shitty index though. For numerous reason, but especially because it is price-weighted.Yup. I first learned what it was like in 1987, then again in 2000, again in 2008. It hasn't gotten real bad this year, yet. My father told me what it was like in '73-74 when the Nifty 50 collapsed.
Food for thought: in 1964 the DOW closed the year at 874. 17 years later in 1981 it closed at 875.
I agree about the DOW being a shitty index. Not sure why it still captures the public's attention.DOW is a really shitty index though. For numerous reason, but especially because it is price-weighted.
If you look at the S&P 500, it went from 76 in 1964 to 133 in 1981.
We have had some pretty long dry spells though. Took close to 25 years for stocks to recover to their 1929 peak. Although, interestingly, if you had been dollar-cost averaging the entire time, starting right at the peak, you actually would have done surprisingly well, because the lows went to the rock bottom and stayed there for a while, and you would have been buying all along.
Such blatant corruption that it’s comical at this point.
yes, dividends were significantly higher back then. https://www.multpl.com/s-p-500-dividend-yieldI agree about the DOW being a shitty index. Not sure why it still captures the public's attention.
Citing your statement about the S&P 500 going from 76 to 133 over 17 years, that still doesn't instill much confidence in people. I think long dry spells like that stress the importance of having dividend paying/mutual fund paying stocks/funds.
Don't lie now, you stole that deworsifying word from Peter Lynch.yes, dividends were significantly higher back then. https://www.multpl.com/s-p-500-dividend-yield
Management has adopted a "Daddy knows best" attitude since the 90's, where they continually retain earnings, even if they have nothing sensible to spend it on. They usually end up "deworsifying" instead of paying out profits to shareholders, or splurging on buybacks at levels where that makes no sense. Shareholders absolutely refuse to stick up for themselves about it. So it goes.
One Up On Wall Street is one of the very few investing books actually worth reading. Not a lot of quality material in the genre.Don't lie now, you stole that deworsifying word from Peter Lynch.
Most of them are fairly redundant.One Up On Wall Street is one of the very few investing books actually worth reading. Not a lot of quality material in the genre.
Thank you Trump for another great opportunity to start my PUT options for Tesla, ahead of their upcoming earnings.
This will be my third time shorting Tesla since March and I'm always happy to see it get back up to 260s/280s before I buy my puts again and offload them in the 230s
Let's see how my fourth time goes