- Joined
- Jun 3, 2012
- Messages
- 4,864
- Reaction score
- 0
They call Anderson The Greatest of All Time,.. over and over,.. just trying to convince people of it. It's really starting to wear on me.
Seriously,.. lets be reasonable, He did not go 9 or 10 years without losing like Fedor.
So the stats are not in his favor.
I don't mind people debating it, or thinking that Anderson is the GOAT, that's fine. You can have valid opinions like that, but to state it as FACT, over and over and the company that writes all of the rules trying to do revisionist history, it's just flat out wrong.
I wish they would just say greatest UFC fighter of all time.
They might could even say greatest active fighter, like Nick implied at the weigh-ins. Even though you could argue that since Chris beat him twice.
I know some of you are going to lash out at me,.. and that's fine,.. but I felt like I had to vent this out on what I consider the best MMA forum (of all time).
Regardless of who you think is really the GOAT, What do you think about them cramming this down our throats and trying to re-write history?
Seriously,.. lets be reasonable, He did not go 9 or 10 years without losing like Fedor.
So the stats are not in his favor.
I don't mind people debating it, or thinking that Anderson is the GOAT, that's fine. You can have valid opinions like that, but to state it as FACT, over and over and the company that writes all of the rules trying to do revisionist history, it's just flat out wrong.
I wish they would just say greatest UFC fighter of all time.
They might could even say greatest active fighter, like Nick implied at the weigh-ins. Even though you could argue that since Chris beat him twice.
I know some of you are going to lash out at me,.. and that's fine,.. but I felt like I had to vent this out on what I consider the best MMA forum (of all time).
Regardless of who you think is really the GOAT, What do you think about them cramming this down our throats and trying to re-write history?
Last edited: